Feasibility of ABLE 1.0—a program aiming at enhancing the ability to perform activities of daily living in persons with chronic conditions
Open Access
- 18 February 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Pilot and Feasibility Studies
- Vol. 7 (1), 1-15
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-021-00790-7
Abstract
The “A Better everyday LifE” (ABLE) intervention was developed to accommodate the need of a program addressing ability to perform activities of daily living (ADL) in persons with chronic conditions living at home. During intervention development, it is necessary to evaluate relevant aspects of the feasibility of a program. Thus, the aim was to evaluate the feasibility of content and delivery of ABLE version 1.0. A one group pre- and post-test design was applied. Thirty persons with chronic conditions, two occupational therapists (OTs), and five occupational therapy students (OTSs) participated. ABLE 1.0 is an 8-week program consisting of ADL evaluation (session 1); goal setting and reasons for ADL problems (session 2); intervention (sessions 3–7); and re-evaluation (final session), conducted in the clients’ home-setting and local area. Sessions 1–4 and the final session was mandatory. To evaluate the feasibility of content and delivery, the OTs, after each session, reported on applied intervention component(s), time-use, needed equipment, adjustments, meaningfulness, confidence, progress toward goal attainment, and side effects using registration forms. The clients reported on progress toward goal attainment, meaningfulness, and satisfaction. Clinically relevant improvements in ADL ability were identified using the ADL-Interview (ADL-I) and the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS). Goal attainment was evaluated using the Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS). Twenty clients (67%) completed ABLE 1.0 and received four sessions (median = 4, range 4–7) each lasting between 30 and 94 min. Most frequently applied component was “Changing habits related to task performance”. Generally, OTs reported having the needed equipment. Deviations from the manual were made by omission of GAS and AMPS and less than mandatory number of sessions per client. The OTs reported confidence in delivering the program and the clients perceived the program as meaningful and satisfying, and experienced progress toward goal attainment. Goal attainment was found in 52% of the goals. Sixteen (80%) clients obtained clinically relevant improvements in self-reported or observed ADL ability. The content and delivery of ABLE 1.0 was feasible. However, the study revealed a need to adjust the recruitment procedure and make minor changes in the intervention manual. A pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) study is recommended. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with registration no. NCT03335709 on November 8, 2017.Keywords
Funding Information
- Danish Association of Occupational Therapists (FF 1 15-5 and FF 2 15-07)
- Oak Foundation (OCAY-13-309)
- Aase og Ejnar Danielsens Fond (40-000887)
This publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:
- An audit of sample sizes for pilot and feasibility trials being undertaken in the United Kingdom registered in the United Kingdom Clinical Research Network databaseBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2013
- Defining and Measuring Chronic Conditions: Imperatives for Research, Policy, Program, and PracticePreventing Chronic Disease, 2013
- Occupational Therapy Interventions for Chronic Diseases: A Scoping ReviewAmerican Journal of Occupational Therapy, 2011
- Feasibility study of a randomized controlled trial of a telephone‐delivered problem‐solving–occupational therapy intervention to reduce participation restrictions in rural breast cancer survivors undergoing chemotherapyPsycho‐Oncology, 2010
- What is a pilot or feasibility study? A review of current practice and editorial policyBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2010
- A tutorial on pilot studies: the what, why and howBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2010
- Energy ConservationHome Health Care Management & Practice, 2009
- How We Design Feasibility StudiesAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2009
- Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidanceBMJ, 2008
- Activities of daily living for old persons in primary health care with chronic heart failureScandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 2008