Evaluation of a very brief pedometer-based physical activity intervention delivered in NHS Health Checks in England: The VBI randomised controlled trial
Open Access
- 1 March 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLoS Medicine
- Vol. 17 (3), e1003046
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003046
Abstract
Background The majority of people do not achieve recommended levels of physical activity. There is a need for effective, scalable interventions to promote activity. Self-monitoring by pedometer is a potentially suitable strategy. We assessed the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a very brief (5-minute) pedometer-based intervention ('Step It Up') delivered as part of National Health Service (NHS) Health Checks in primary care. Methods and findings The Very Brief Intervention (VBI) Trial was a two parallel-group, randomised controlled trial (RCT) with 3-month follow-up, conducted in 23 primary care practices in the East of England. Participants were 1,007 healthy adults aged 40 to 74 years eligible for an NHS Health Check. They were randomly allocated (1:1) using a web-based tool between October 1, 2014, and December 31, 2015, to either intervention (505) or control group (502), stratified by primary care practice. Participants were aware of study group allocation. Control participants received the NHS Health Check only. Intervention participants additionally received Step It Up: a 5-minute face-to-face discussion, written materials, pedometer, and step chart. The primary outcome was accelerometer-based physical activity volume at 3-month follow-up adjusted for sex, 5-year age group, and general practice. Secondary outcomes included time spent in different intensities of physical activity, self-reported physical activity, and economic measures. We conducted an in-depth fidelity assessment on a subsample of Health Check consultations. Participants' mean age was 56 years, two-thirds were female, they were predominantly white, and two-thirds were in paid employment. The primary outcome was available in 859 (85.3%) participants. There was no significant between-group difference in activity volume at 3 months (adjusted intervention effect 8.8 counts per minute [cpm]; 95% CI -18.7 to 36.3; p = 0.53). We found no significant between-group differences in the secondary outcomes of step counts per day, time spent in moderate or vigorous activity, time spent in vigorous activity, and time spent in moderate-intensity activity (accelerometer-derived variables); as well as in total physical activity, home-based activity, work-based activity, leisure-based activity, commuting physical activity, and screen or TV time (self-reported physical activity variables). Of the 505 intervention participants, 491 (97%) received the Step it Up intervention. Analysis of 37 intervention consultations showed that 60% of Step it Up components were delivered faithfully. The intervention cost 18.04 pound per participant. Incremental cost to the NHS per 1,000-step increase per day was 96 pound and to society was 239 pound. Adverse events were reported by 5 intervention participants (of which 2 were serious) and 5 control participants (of which 2 were serious). The study's limitations include a participation rate of 16% and low return of audiotapes by practices for fidelity assessment. Conclusions In this large well-conducted trial, we found no evidence of effect of a plausible very brief pedometer intervention embedded in NHS Health Checks on objectively measured activity at 3-month follow-up.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Institute for Health Research (RP-PG-0608-10079)
- UK Medical Research Council (MC_UU_12015/3)
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre Cambridge (IS-BRC-1215-20014)
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Predictors of change in objectively measured and self-reported health behaviours among individuals with recently diagnosed type 2 diabetes: longitudinal results from the ADDITION-Plustrial cohortInternational Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 2013
- Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancyThe Lancet, 2012
- Including all individuals is not enough: Lessons for intention-to-treat analysisClinical Trials, 2012
- The economic burden of ill health due to diet, physical inactivity, smoking, alcohol and obesity in the UK: an update to 2006-07 NHS costsJournal of Public Health, 2011
- The effect of mere-measurement of cognitions on physical activity behavior: a randomized controlled trial among overweight and obese individualsInternational Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 2011
- Who will increase their physical activity? Predictors of change in objectively measured physical activity over 12 months in the ProActive cohortBMC Public Health, 2010
- Estimating physical activity energy expenditure, sedentary time, and physical activity intensity by self-report in adultsThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2010
- Effect of Pedometer-Based Physical Activity Interventions: A Meta-AnalysisResearch Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 2009
- Effect of Pedometer-Based Physical Activity InterventionsResearch Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 2009
- The Validity and Reproducibility of a Work Productivity and Activity Impairment InstrumentPharmacoEconomics, 1993