Reply to Slim et al.
- 19 November 2019
- journal article
- letter
- Published by Wiley in Colorectal Disease
- Vol. 22 (4), 466-467
- https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.14911
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Successful patient-oriented surgical outcomes in robotic vs laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for cancer - a systematic reviewColorectal Disease, 2020
- Why most published meta-analysis findings are falseTechniques in Coloproctology, 2019
- From Laparoscopic Right Colectomy with Extracorporeal Anastomosis to Robot-Assisted Intracorporeal Anastomosis to Totally Robotic Right Colectomy for Cancer: The Evolution of Robotic Multiquadrant Abdominal SurgeryJournal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques, 2018
- Baseline Morphine Consumption May Explain Between-Study Heterogeneity in Meta-analyses of Adjuvant Analgesics and Improve Precision and Accuracy of Effect EstimatesAnesthesia & Analgesia, 2018
- Robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysisSurgical Endoscopy, 2017
- Robotic right hemicolectomy: Analysis of 108 consecutive procedures and multidimensional assessment of the learning curveSurgical Oncology, 2017
- Developing Strategic Health Care Key Performance Indicators: A Case Study on a Tertiary Care HospitalProcedia Computer Science, 2015
- Robotic-Assisted Intracorporeal Anastomosis Versus Extracorporeal Anastomosis in Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy for Cancer: A Case Control StudyJournal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques, 2013
- Randomized clinical trial of robot-assisted versus standard laparoscopic right colectomyBritish Journal of Surgery, 2012