Do Sex Differences in Physiology Confer a Female Advantage in Ultra-Endurance Sport?
Top Cited Papers
- 27 January 2021
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Sports Medicine
- Vol. 51 (5), 895-915
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-020-01417-2
Abstract
Ultra-endurance has been defined as any exercise bout that exceeds 6 h. A number of exceptional, record-breaking performances by female athletes in ultra-endurance sport have roused speculation that they might be predisposed to success in such events. Indeed, while the male-to-female performance gap in traditional endurance sport (e.g., marathon) remains at ~ 10%, the disparity in ultra-endurance competition has been reported as low as 4% despite the markedly lower number of female participants. Moreover, females generally outperform males in extreme-distance swimming. The issue is complex, however, with many sports-specific considerations and caveats. This review summarizes the sex-based differences in physiological functions and draws attention to those which likely determine success in extreme exercise endeavors. The aim is to provide a balanced discussion of the female versus male predisposition to ultra-endurance sport. Herein, we discuss sex-based differences in muscle morphology and fatigability, respiratory-neuromechanical function, substrate utilization, oxygen utilization, gastrointestinal structure and function, and hormonal control. The literature indicates that while females exhibit numerous phenotypes that would be expected to confer an advantage in ultra-endurance competition (e.g., greater fatigue resistance, greater substrate efficiency, and lower energetic demands), they also exhibit several characteristics that unequivocally impinge on performance (e.g., lower O2-carrying capacity, increased prevalence of GI distress, and sex-hormone effects on cellular function/injury risk). Crucially, the advantageous traits may only manifest as ergogenic in the extreme endurance events which, paradoxically, are those that females less often contest. The title question should be revisited in the coming years, when/if the number of female participants increases.Keywords
This publication has 208 references indexed in Scilit:
- Aerobic Capacity Reference Data in 3816 Healthy Men and Women 20–90 YearsPLOS ONE, 2013
- Update on stress fractures in female athletes: epidemiology, treatment, and preventionCurrent Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine, 2013
- Acute metabolic responses to a 24-h ultra-marathon race in male amateur runnersEuropean Journal of Applied Physiology, 2011
- Gender Bias in Gastroparesis: Is Nitric Oxide the Answer?Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2011
- Variations in varus/valgus and internal/external rotational knee laxity and stiffness across the menstrual cycleJournal of Orthopaedic Research, 2010
- Disparity in regional and systemic circulatory capacities: do they affect the regulation of the circulation?Acta Physiologica, 2010
- Central and peripheral contributions to neuromuscular fatigue induced by a 24-h treadmill runJournal of Applied Physiology, 2010
- Higher skeletal muscle α2AMPK activation and lower energy charge and fat oxidation in men than in women during submaximal exerciseThe Journal of Physiology, 2006
- Skeletal Muscle Fiber Type: Influence on Contractile and Metabolic PropertiesPLoS Biology, 2004
- Are Anxiety and Depression Related to Gastrointestinal Symptoms in the General Population?Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 2002