Comparison of Virtual Ultrasonographic Hysteroscopy with Conventional Hysteroscopy in the Workup of Patients Who Are Infertile
- 18 March 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
- Vol. 28 (1), 63-74
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2020.03.003
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Fly Thru imaging: Feasibility study and comparison with outpatient hysteroscopyAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2017
- Virtual hysteroscopy: a new non invasive approach for the assessment of uterine cavityMedical Ultrasonography, 2017
- Virtual ultrasonographic hysteroscopy followed by conventional operative hysteroscopy, enabling pregnancyAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2016
- Efficacy of hysteroscopy in improving reproductive outcomes of infertile couples: a systematic review and meta-analysisHuman Reproduction Update, 2016
- Optimal uterine anatomy and physiology necessary for normal implantation and placentationFertility and Sterility, 2016
- The Thessaloniki ESHRE/ESGE consensus on diagnosis of female genital anomaliesHuman Reproduction, 2015
- Virtual fetal laryngoscopyUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2013
- Comparative study on the role of diagnostic hysteroscopy in evaluation of the uterine cavity prior to in vitro fertilization in a developing countryArchiv für Gynäkologie, 2013
- Detection of intracavitary uterine pathology using offline analysis of three‐dimensional ultrasound volumes: interobserver agreement and diagnostic accuracyUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2012
- Accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasound in diagnosis and classification of congenital uterine anomaliesFertility and Sterility, 2008