Why Methodology Is Important: Coffee as a Candidate Treatment for COVID-19?
Open Access
- 16 November 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Vol. 9 (11), 3691
- https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9113691
Abstract
Background: During this pandemic situation, some studies have led to hasty conclusions about Corona Virus Disease-19 (COVID-19) treatment, due to a lack of methodology. This pedagogic study aimed to highlight potential biases in research on COVID-19 treatment. Methods: We evaluate the effect of coffee’s active part, 1,3,7-trimethylxanthine (TMX) on patients with COVID-19. A cohort of 93 patients, with a diagnosis of COVID-19 is analyzed. Results: TMX group and control group included, respectively, 26 and 67 patients. In the TMX group, patients had a median length of stay in hospital of 5.5 days shorter than in the control group (9.5 vs. 15 days, p < 0.05). Patients in the control group were more severe than patients in the TMX group with a significantly higher National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS-2 score) (8 vs. 6, p = 0.002). Conclusions: Multiple biases prevents us from concluding to an effect of coffee on COVID-19. Despite an important social pressure during this crisis, methodology and conscientiousness are the best way to avoid hasty conclusions that can be deleterious for patients. Identifier: NCT04395742.Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Adverse effects of caffeinated energy drinks among youth and young adults in Canada: a Web-based surveyCMAJ Open, 2018
- ‘Spin’ in published biomedical literature: A methodological systematic reviewPLoS Biology, 2017
- It’s no laughing matter: An exploratory study of the use of ironic versus sarcastic humor in health-related advertising messagesHealth Marketing Quarterly, 2017
- Propensity Score: an Alternative Method of Analyzing Treatment EffectsDeutsches Ärzteblatt international, 2016
- The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studiesInternational Journal of Surgery, 2014
- Randomised controlled trials and population-based observational research: partners in the evolution of medical evidenceBritish Journal of Cancer, 2014
- The Table 2 Fallacy: Presenting and Interpreting Confounder and Modifier CoefficientsAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2013
- The GRADE approach and Bradford Hill's criteria for causationJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2010
- Reducing bias through directed acyclic graphsBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2008
- Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research DesignsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2000