Comparison of Transabdominal and Transrectal Ultrasound for Sizing of the Prostate
- 22 April 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Urology
- Vol. 141, 125-129
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2020.04.054
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Portable bedside ultrasound: the visual stethoscope of the 21st centuryScandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, 2012
- AAPM/RSNA Physics Tutorial for Residents: Physics of Flat-Panel Fluoroscopy SystemsRadioGraphics, 2011
- The Impact of Pretreatment Prostate Volume on Severe Acute Genitourinary Toxicity in Prostate Cancer Patients Treated With Intensity-Modulated Radiation TherapyInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 2011
- Smaller Prostate Size Predicts High Grade Prostate Cancer at Final PathologyJournal of Urology, 2010
- Body Mass Index, Prostate Weight and Transrectal Ultrasound Prostate Volume AccuracyJournal of Urology, 2007
- Recent Advances in Ultrasound TechnologyClinical Techniques in Small Animal Practice, 2007
- Prostate Volume Ultrasonography: The Influence of Transabdominal versus Transrectal Approach, Device Type and OperatorEuropean Urology, 2004
- Prostate Volume Reduction With Androgen Deprivation Therapy Before Interstitial BrachytherapyJournal of Urology, 2002
- Reassessment of nonplanimetric transrectal ultrasound prostate volume estimatesUrology, 1996
- Assessment of Volume Measurement of the Prostate Using Per‐rectal UltrasonographyBritish Journal of Urology, 1989