Using hydrological and climatic catchment clusters to explore drivers of catchment behavior
Open Access
- 5 March 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Copernicus GmbH in Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
- Vol. 24 (3), 1081-1100
- https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-1081-2020
Abstract
The behavior of every catchment is unique. Still, we seek for ways to classify them as this helps to improve hydrological theories. In this study, we use hydrological signatures that were recently identified as those with the highest spatial predictability to cluster 643 catchments from the CAMELS dataset. We describe the resulting clusters concerning their behavior, location and attributes. We then analyze the connections between the resulting clusters and the catchment attributes and relate this to the co-variability of the catchment attributes in the eastern and western US. To explore whether the observed differences result from clustering catchments by either climate or hydrological behavior, we compare the hydrological clusters to climatic ones. We find that for the overall dataset climate is the most important factor for the hydrological behavior. However, depending on the location, either aridity, snow or seasonality has the largest influence. The clusters derived from the hydrological signatures partly follow ecoregions in the US and can be grouped into four main behavior trends. In addition, the clusters show consistent low flow behavior, even though the hydrological signatures used describe high and mean flows only. We can also show that most of the catchments in the CAMELS dataset have a low range of hydrological behaviors, while some more extreme catchments deviate from that trend. In the comparison of climatic and hydrological clusters, we see that the widely used Köppen–Geiger climate classification is not suitable to find hydrologically similar catchments. However, in comparison with novel, hydrologically based continuous climate classifications, some clusters follow the climate classification very directly, while others do not. From those results, we conclude that the signal of the climatic forcing can be found more explicitly in the behavior of some catchments than in others. It remains unclear if this is caused by a higher intra-catchment variability of the climate or a higher influence of other catchment attributes, overlaying the climate signal. Our findings suggest that very different sets of catchment attributes and climate can cause very similar hydrological behavior of catchments – a sort of equifinality of the catchment response.This publication has 43 references indexed in Scilit:
- A decade of Predictions in Ungauged Basins (PUB)—a reviewHydrological Sciences Journal, 2013
- Exploring the physical controls of regional patterns of flow duration curves – Part 4: A synthesis of empirical analysis, process modeling and catchment classificationHydrology and Earth System Sciences, 2012
- Exploring the physical controls of regional patterns of flow duration curves – Part 3: A catchment classification system based on regime curve indicatorsHydrology and Earth System Sciences, 2012
- Prediction in ungauged basins: a grand challenge for theoretical hydrologyHydrological Processes, 2003
- Distributed assessment of contributing area and riparian buffering along stream networksWater Resources Research, 2003
- Scaling in hydrologyHydrological Processes, 2001
- Uniqueness of place and process representations in hydrological modellingHydrology and Earth System Sciences, 2000
- Catchment similarity for regional flood frequency analysis using seasonality measuresJournal of Hydrology, 1997
- Hierarchical Grouping to Optimize an Objective FunctionJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1963
- HIERARCHICAL GROUPING TO OPTIMIZE AN OBJECTIVE FUNCTIONJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1962