Assessment of the quality of end-of-life care: translation and validation of the German version of the "Care of the Dying Evaluation" (CODE-GER) - a questionnaire for bereaved relatives
Open Access
- 22 September 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
- Vol. 18 (1), 1-15
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-020-01473-2
Abstract
Background: International studies indicate deficits in end-of-life care that can lead to distress for patients and their next-of-kin. The aim of the study was to translate and validate the "Care of the Dying Evaluation" (CODE) into German (CODE-GER). Methods: Translation according to EORTC (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer) guidelines was followed by data collection to evaluate psychometric properties of CODE-GER. Participants were next-of-kin of patients who had died an expected death in two hospitals. They were invited to participate at least eight, but not later than 16 weeks after the patient's death. To calculate construct validity, the Palliative care Outcome Scale (POS) was assessed. Difficulty and perceived strain of answering the questionnaire were assessed by a numeric scale (0-10). Results: Out of 1137 next-of-kin eligible, 317 completed the questionnaire (response rate: 27.9%). Data from 237 main sample participants, 38 interraters and 55 next-of-kin who participated for repeated measurement were analysed. Overall internal consistency, alpha = 0.86, interrater reliability, ICC (1) = 0.79, and retest-reliability, ICC (1, 2) = 0.85, were good. Convergent validity between POS and CODE-GER, r = -.46, was satisfactory. A principal component analysis with varimax rotation showed a 7-factor solution. Difficulty, M = 2.2; SD +/- 2.4, and perceived strain, M = 4.1; SD +/- 3.0, of completing the questionnaire were rather low. Conclusion: The results from the present study confirm CODE-GER as a reliable and valid instrument to assess the quality of care of the dying person. More over our study adds value to the original questionnaire by proposing a deepened analysis of obtained data. The development of seven subscales increases its potential for further surveys and research.Keywords
Funding Information
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (WE 561312-1)
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Measures of Interrater AgreementJournal of Thoracic Oncology, 2011
- Comparison of techniques for handling missing covariate data within prognostic modelling studies: a simulation studyBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2010
- Missing Data Analysis: Making It Work in the Real WorldAnnual Review of Psychology, 2009
- Measuring End-of-Life Care Outcomes RetrospectivelyJournal of Palliative Medicine, 2005
- Validation and Clinical Application of the German Version of the Palliative Care Outcome ScaleJournal of Pain and Symptom Management, 2005
- After-Death Interviews with Surrogates/Bereaved Family Members: Some Issues of ValidityJournal of Pain and Symptom Management, 2001
- Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha.Psychological Assessment, 1996
- The Scree Test For The Number Of FactorsMultivariate Behavioral Research, 1966
- A NOTE ON GUTTMAN'S LOWER BOUND FOR THE NUMBER OF COMMON FACTORS1British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 1961
- Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of testsPsychometrika, 1951