Transient elastography versus liver biopsy: discordance in evaluations for fibrosis and steatosis from a pathology standpoint
- 1 October 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Laboratory Investigation
- Vol. 34 (10), 1955-1962
- https://doi.org/10.1038/s41379-021-00851-5
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Direct comparison of the FibroScan XL and M probes for assessment of liver fibrosis in obese and nonobese patientsHepatic Medicine: Evidence and Research, 2013
- Determination of reliability criteria for liver stiffness evaluation by transient elastographyHepatology, 2012
- Diagnostic accuracy of FibroScan and comparison to liver fibrosis biomarkers in chronic viral hepatitis: A multicenter prospective study (the FIBROSTIC study)Journal of Hepatology, 2010
- Is transient elastography a useful tool for screening liver disease?World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2009
- Extrahepatic cholestasis increases liver stiffness (FibroScan) irrespective of fibrosisHepatology, 2008
- Performance of Transient Elastography for the Staging of Liver Fibrosis: A Meta-AnalysisGastroenterology, 2008
- Acute viral hepatitis increases liver stiffness values measured by transient elastographyHepatology, 2007
- Reproducibility of transient elastography in the evaluation of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic liver diseaseGut, 2007
- Transient elastography: a new surrogate marker of liver fibrosis influenced by major changes of transaminasesJournal of Viral Hepatitis, 2006
- Prevalence of hepatic steatosis in an urban population in the United States: Impact of ethnicityHepatology, 2004