Real-world evidence: perspectives on challenges, value, and alignment of regulatory and national health technology assessment data collection requirements
Open Access
- 24 February 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
- Vol. 37 (1), e40
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462321000131
Abstract
Objective This study aims to assess stakeholder perceptions on the challenges and value of real-world evidence (RWE) post approval, the differences in regulatory and health technology assessment (HTA) real-world data (RWD) collection requirements under the German regulation for more safety in drug supply (GSAV), and future alignment opportunities to create a complementary framework for postapproval RWE requirements. Methods Eleven semistructured interviews were conducted purposively with pharmaceutical industry experts, regulatory authorities, health technology assessment bodies (HTAbs), and academia. The interview questions focused on the role of RWE post approval, the added value and challenges of RWE, the most important requirements for RWD collection, experience with registries as a source of RWD, perceptions on the GSAV law, RWE requirements in other countries, and the differences between regulatory and HTA requirements and alignment opportunities. The interviews were recorded, transcribed, and translated for coding in Nvivo to summarize the findings. Results All experts agree that RWE could close evidence gaps by showing the actual value of medicines in patients under real-world conditions. However, experts acknowledged certain challenges such as: (i) heterogeneous perspectives and differences in outcome measures for RWE generation and (ii) missing practical experience with RWD collected through mandatory registries within the German benefit assessment due to an unclear implementation of the GSAV. Conclusions This study revealed that all stakeholder groups recognize the added value of RWE but experience conflicting demands for RWD collection. Harmonizing requirements can be achieved through common postlicensing evidence generation (PLEG) plans and joint scientific advice to address uncertainties regarding evidence needs and to optimize drug development.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Regulatory and health technology assessment advice on postlicensing and postlaunch evidence generation is a foundation for lifecycle data collection for medicinesBritish Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2020
- Real‐World Data for Regulatory Decision Making: Challenges and Possible Solutions for EuropeCancer Cell, 2019
- Real world data: an opportunity to supplement existing evidence for the use of long-established medicines in health care decision makingJournal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 2018
- EU-funded initiatives for real world evidence: descriptive analysis of their characteristics and relevance for regulatory decision-makingBMJ Open, 2018
- Using Real-World Data in Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Practice: A Comparative Study of Five HTA AgenciesPharmacoEconomics, 2017
- Policies for Use of Real-World Data in Health Technology Assessment (HTA): A Comparative Study of Six HTA AgenciesValue in Health, 2017
- Review of Policies And Perspectives on Real-World Data for Drug Development and Assessment (Imi-Getreal Deliverable)Value in Health, 2015