Effects of integrated economic and health interventions with women’s groups on health-related knowledge, behaviours and outcomes in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review protocol
Open Access
- 12 July 2021
- Vol. 11 (7), e046856
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046856
Abstract
Introduction Economic groups, such as microfinance or self-help groups are widely implemented in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). Women’s groups are voluntary groups, which aim to improve the well-being of members through activities, such as joint savings, credit, livelihoods development and/or health activities. Health interventions are increasingly added on to existing women’s economic groups as a public health intervention for women and their families. Here, we present the protocol for a mixed-methods systematic review we will conduct of the evidence on integrated economic and health interventions on women’s groups to assess whether and how they improve health-related knowledge, behaviour and outcomes in LMICs. Methods and analysis We will search seven electronic databases for published literature, along with manual searches and consultation. The review will include (1) randomised trials and non-randomised quasiexperimental studies of intervention effects of integrated economic and health interventions delivered through women’s groups in LMICs, and (2) sibling studies that examine factors related to intervention content, context, implementation processes and costs. We will appraise risk of bias and study quality using standard tools. High and moderate quality studies will be grouped by health domain and synthesised without meta-analysis. Qualitative evidence will be thematically synthesised and integrated into the quantitative synthesis using a matrix approach. Ethics and dissemination This protocol was reviewed and deemed exempt by the institutional review board at the American Institutes for Research. Findings will be shared through peer-reviewed publication and disseminated with programme implementers and policymakers engaged with women’s groups. PROSPERO registration number CRD42020199998.Keywords
Funding Information
- Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (OPP1201417)
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventionsBMJ, 2016
- Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidanceBMJ, 2015
- Integrating Group Counseling, Cell Phone Messaging, and Participant-Generated Songs and Dramas into a Microcredit Program Increases Nigerian Women’s Adherence to International Breastfeeding RecommendationsJournal of Nutrition, 2014
- Better Quasi-Experimental PracticePublished by SAGE Publications ,2012
- Village savings and loans: A pathway to financial inclusion for Africa's poorest householdsEnterprise Development & Microfinance, 2011
- Randomized Controlled Studies and Alternative Designs in Outcome StudiesResearch on Social Work Practice, 2011
- The views of young children in the UK about obesity, body size, shape and weight: a systematic reviewBMC Public Health, 2011
- Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviewsBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2008
- Effect of a structural intervention for the prevention of intimate-partner violence and HIV in rural South Africa: a cluster randomised trialThe Lancet, 2006
- Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysisJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2001