Simultaneous versus staged resection for synchronous colorectal liver metastases: A population-based cost analysis in Ontario, Canada - Health economic evaluation
- 23 April 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in International Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 78, 75-82
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.04.044
Abstract
Background: Simultaneous compared to staged resection of synchronous colorectal cancer liver metastases is considered safe. We aimed to determine their cost implications. Study Design: Population-based cohort was generated by linking administrative healthcare datasets in Ontario, Canada (2006–2014). Resection of colorectal cancer and liver metastases within six months was considered synchronous. Cost analysis was performed from the perspective of a third-party payer. Median costs with range were estimated using the log-normal distribution of cost using t-test with a one-year time horizon. Results: Among patients undergoing staged resection (n = 678), the estimated median cost was $54,321 CAD (IQR 45,472 to 68,475) and $41,286 CAD (IQR 31,633 to 58,958) for those undergoing simultaneous resection (n = 390), median difference: $13,035 CAD (p < 0.001). Primary cost driver were all costs related to hospitalization for liver and colon resection, which was higher for the staged approach, median difference: $16,346 CAD (p < 0.001). This was mainly due to a longer median length of hospital stay in the staged vs. simultaneous group (11 vs. 8 days, p < 0.001 respectively), which was not attributable to differences in major postoperative complication rates (23% vs. 28%, p = 0.067 respectively). Other costs, including cost of chemotherapy within six months of surgery ($11,681 CAD vs. $8644 CAD, p = 0.074 respectively) and 90-day re-hospitalization cost ($2155 CAD vs. $2931 CAD, p = 0.454 respectively) were similar between groups. Conclusion: Cost of staged resection of synchronous colorectal cancer liver metastases is significantly higher compared to the simultaneous approach, mostly driven by a longer length of hospital stay despite similar postoperative complication rates.Keywords
Funding Information
- McMaster University
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Use and Dissemination of the Brisbane 2000 Nomenclature of Liver Anatomy and ResectionsAnnals of Surgery, 2013
- Shifting trends in liver-directed management of patients with colorectal liver metastasis: A population-based analysisSurgery, 2011
- Staged or simultaneous resection of synchronous liver metastases from colorectal cancer – a systematic reviewColorectal Disease, 2008
- Perioperative chemotherapy with FOLFOX4 and surgery versus surgery alone for resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer (EORTC Intergroup trial 40983): a randomised controlled trialThe Lancet, 2008
- Simultaneous Resections of Colorectal Cancer and Synchronous Liver Metastases: A Multi-institutional AnalysisAnnals of Surgical Oncology, 2007
- Administrative data accurately identified intensive care unit admissions in OntarioJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2006
- Epidemiology and Management of Liver Metastases From Colorectal CancerAnnals of Surgery, 2006
- Influence of Preoperative Chemotherapy on the Risk of Major Hepatectomy for Colorectal Liver MetastasesAnnals of Surgery, 2006
- Classification of Surgical ComplicationsAnnals of Surgery, 2004
- Simultaneous Liver and Colorectal Resections Are Safe for Synchronous Colorectal Liver MetastasisJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 2003