Osteoarthritis physical activity care pathway (OA-PCP): results of a feasibility trial
Open Access
- 16 May 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
- Vol. 21 (1), 1-11
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03339-6
Abstract
To obtain information on feasibility and acceptability, as well as preliminary data on efficacy, of an Osteoarthritis Physical activity Care Pathway (OA-PCP). This was a single group pilot study involving 60 participants with symptomatic, physician diagnosed knee or hip OA, recruited from primary care clinics. Participants self-reported completing less than 150 min per week of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) at baseline. The 3-month OA-PCP intervention involved 3 physical activity (PA) coaching calls (focused on goal setting), three check-in emails and linkage with community-based or online resources to support PA. Efficacy outcomes were collected at baseline and 4-month follow-up. The primary efficacy outcome was minutes of MVPA, assessed via accelerometer. Secondary outcomes included minutes of light intensity activity, sedentary minutes, step counts, and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) pain and function subscales. Participants were also asked to rate the helpfulness of the OA-PCP intervention on a scale of 0–10. Differences in efficacy outcomes between baseline and 4-month follow-up were assessed using paired t-tests. Among participants beginning the study, 88% completed follow-up assessments and ≥ 90% completed each of the intervention calls. Average daily minutes of MVPA was 8.0 at baseline (standard deviation (SD) = 9.9) and 8.9 at follow-up (SD = 12.1, p = 0.515). There were no statistically significant changes in light intensity activity, sedentary time or step counts. The mean WOMAC pain score improved from 8.1 (SD = 3.6) at baseline to 6.2 (SD = 3.8) at follow-up (p < 0.001); the mean WOMAC function score improved from 26.2 (SD = 13.2) to 20.2 (SD = 12.5; p < 0.001). The mean rating of helpfulness was 7.6 (SD = 2.5). Results supported the feasibility and acceptability of the study, and participants reported clinically relevant improvements in pain and function. PA metrics did not improve substantially. Based on these results and participant feedback, modifications including enhanced self-monitoring are being made to increase the impact of the OA-PCP intervention on PA behavior. NCT03780400, December 19, 2018.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Institute on Aging (R21AG056568)
This publication has 52 references indexed in Scilit:
- Health Care Providers’ Recommendations for Physical Activity and Adherence to Physical Activity Guidelines Among Adults With ArthritisPreventing Chronic Disease, 2013
- Initial Validation of an Exercise “Vital Sign” in Electronic Medical RecordsMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2012
- A Comprehensive Review of the Effectiveness of Different Exercise Programs for Patients with OsteoarthritisThe Physician and Sportsmedicine, 2012
- Effectiveness of physical activity promotion based in primary care: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trialsBMJ, 2012
- The cost of changing physical activity behaviour: evidence from a "physical activity pathway" in the primary care settingBMC Public Health, 2011
- A process evaluation of a "physical activity pathway" in the primary care settingBMC Public Health, 2010
- Physical activity recommendations for health: what should Europe do?BMC Public Health, 2010
- The self‐administered comorbidity questionnaire: A new method to assess comorbidity for clinical and health services researchArthritis Care & Research, 2003
- An Ecological Perspective on Health Promotion ProgramsHealth Education Quarterly, 1988
- Transtheoretical therapy: Toward a more integrative model of change.Psychotherapy, 1982