Comparison of the effects of radiotherapy doses of 50.4 Gy and 60 Gy on outcomes of chemoradiotherapy for thoracic esophageal cancer: subgroup analysis based on the Comprehensive Registry of Esophageal Cancer in Japan from 2009 to 2011 by the Japan Esophageal Society
Open Access
- 1 April 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Esophagus
- Vol. 17 (2), 122-126
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-019-00711-x
Abstract
Background In definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRTx) for esophageal cancer, a radiotherapy (RT) dose of 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions has been the standard in many countries, while 60 Gy in 30 fractions has been frequently used in Japan. To clarify the optimal RT dose in CRTx for esophageal cancer, we compared clinical outcomes with the two doses using data from the Comprehensive Registry of Esophageal Cancer in Japan by the Japan Esophageal Society (JES). Methods Of the patients enrolled in the registry for 2015-2017 surveys (patients treated between 2009 and 2011), 996 patients who received definitive CRTx with 50.4 Gy or 60 Gy for thoracic esophageal cancer were eligible for analysis. Results The complete response (CR) rates in the 50.4 Gy and 60 Gy groups were 49.1% and 46.4%, respectively (p = 0.5851). The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates in the 50.4 Gy group and 60 Gy group for stages I, II/III and IV were 64.2% and 57.2%, 35.0% and 27.0%, and 18.0% and 15.3%, respectively. Since no significant difference was found between the two groups, the 50.4 Gy group was not inferior to the 60 Gy group with regard to OS. Conclusions The analysis revealed that the 50.4 Gy group had a non-inferior outcome in comparison with the 60 Gy group for stages I, II/III and IV thoracic esophageal cancer. These results were obtained from a large database for the first time in Japan.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Standard-dose versus high-dose conformal radiotherapy with concurrent and consolidation carboplatin plus paclitaxel with or without cetuximab for patients with stage IIIA or IIIB non-small-cell lung cancer (RTOG 0617): a randomised, two-by-two factorial phase 3 studyThe Lancet Oncology, 2015
- Salvage Esophagectomy for Locoregional Failure After Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Advanced Esophageal CancerThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2012
- Salvage Esophagectomy After Failed Definitive Chemoradiation for Esophageal AdenocarcinomaThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2012
- Phase II Study of Chemoradiotherapy With 5-Fluorouracil and Cisplatin for Stage II–III Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: JCOG Trial (JCOG 9906)International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 2010
- Radiation Therapy for Esophageal Cancer in Japan: Results of the Patterns of Care Study 1999–2001International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 2009
- A Phase II Trial of Chemoradiotherapy for Stage I Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study (JCOG9708)Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2009
- New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)European Journal Of Cancer, 2009
- Long-Term Results of the M. D. Anderson Randomized Dose-Escalation Trial for Prostate CancerInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 2008
- Comparison of Conventional-Dose vs High-Dose Conformal Radiation Therapy in Clinically Localized Adenocarcinoma of the ProstateJAMA, 2005
- INT 0123 (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 94-05) Phase III Trial of Combined-Modality Therapy for Esophageal Cancer: High-Dose Versus Standard-Dose Radiation TherapyJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2002