Cost analysis of laparoscopic appendectomy in a large integrated healthcare system
- 27 January 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Surgical Endoscopy
- Vol. 36 (1), 800-807
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08266-0
Abstract
Introduction Healthcare expenditure is on the rise placing greater emphasis on operational excellence, cost containment, and high quality of care. Significant variation is seen in operating room (OR) costs with common surgical procedures such as laparoscopic appendectomy. Surgeons can influence cost through the selection of instrumentation for common surgical procedures such as laparoscopic appendectomy. We aimed to quantify the cost of laparoscopic appendectomy in our healthcare system and compare cost variations to operative times and outcomes. Methods and procedures We performed a retrospective review of laparoscopic appendectomies in a large regional healthcare system during one-year period (2018). Operating room supply costs and procedure durations were obtained for each hospital. The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) outcomes and demographics were compared to the costs for each hospital. Results A total of 4757 laparoscopic appendectomies were performed at 20 hospitals (27 to 522 per hospital) by 233 surgeons. The average supply cost per case ranged from $650 to $1067. Individual surgeon cost ranged from $197 to $1181. The average operative time was 41 min (range 33 to 60 min). There was no association between lower cost and longer operative time. The patient demographics and comorbidities were similar between sites. There were no significant differences in postoperative complications between high- and low-cost centers. The items with the greatest increase in cost were single-use energy devices (SUD) and endoscopic stapler. We estimate that a saving of over $417 per case is possible by avoiding the use of energy devices and may be as high as $ 984 by adding selective use of staplers. These modifications would result in an annual savings of $1 million for our health system and more than $ 125 million nationwide. Conclusion Performing laparoscopic appendectomy with reusable instruments and finding alternatives to expensive energy devices and staplers can significantly decrease costs and does not increase operative time or postoperative complications.
Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Regional cost analysis for laparoscopic cholecystectomySurgical Endoscopy, 2018
- Optimal stump management in laparoscopic appendectomy: A network meta-analysis by the Minimally Invasive Surgery Synthesis of Interventions and Outcomes NetworkSurgery, 2017
- Lateral thermal damage of mesoappendix and appendiceal base during laparoscopic appendectomy in children: comparison of the harmonic scalpel (Ultracision), bipolar coagulation (LigaSure), and thermal fusion technology (MiSeal)Journal of Surgical Research, 2017
- US Spending on Personal Health Care and Public Health, 1996-2013JAMA, 2016
- Cost variation in a laparoscopic cholecystectomy and the association with outcomes across a single health system: implications for standardization and improved resource utilizationHPB, 2015
- Educating surgeons on intraoperative disposable supply costs during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a regional health system's experienceThe American Journal of Surgery, 2015
- A Systemic Approach to Containing Health Care SpendingNew England Journal of Medicine, 2012
- Comparison of the Electrothermal Vessel-Sealing System Versus Endoclip in Laparoscopic AppendectomyJournal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques, 2009
- Economic Analysis of Reprocessing Single-Use Medical Devices: A Systematic Literature ReviewInfection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 2008
- Laparoscopic Appendectomy Using the LigaSure™ Vessel Sealing SystemJournal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques, 2005