Increases in arm volume predict lymphoedema and quality of life deficits after axillary surgery: a prospective cohort study
Open Access
- 4 May 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in British Journal of Cancer
- Vol. 123 (1), 17-25
- https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-020-0844-4
Abstract
Background: Lymphoedema develops after axillary clearance (ANC) in 25% of patients. This prospective, multi-centre study compared multi-frequency bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) with arm volume measurement to: (1) determine which test has better diagnostic accuracy, (2) identify factors predicting development of lymphoedema, and its effect on quality-of-life. Methods: Participants (N = 1100) underwent measurements pre and post-ANC surgery for breast cancer. Relative arm volume increase (RAVI) of >10% diagnosed lymphoedema. Predictors of lymphoedema were determined using logistic regression. Optimal diagnostic method was assessed using diagnostic accuracy. Quality-of-life was assessed using the FACT B + 4 questionnaire. Results: Lymphoedema was diagnosed in 22.8% women using RAVI > 10%, 45.6% using BIS criteria, while 24.5% underwent compression sleeve application by 24 months. BMI > 30 was an independent factor for both development (p = 0.005) and progression (p = 0.015) of lymphoedema. RAVI at 1 month, BMI > 30 and number of involved nodes contributed to a novel scoring model to predict lymphoedema by 36 months. Larger decreases in QoL scores post-surgery occurred in lymphoedema patients (p < 0.001). Progression to moderate lymphoedema occurred in 15% patients after sleeve application. Conclusions: RAVI measurement was the best diagnostic tool for lymphoedema. BIS alone is not appropriate for lymphoedema screening or diagnosis. BMI > 30 predicted lymphoedema diagnosis and progression.Keywords
Funding Information
- DH | National Institute for Health Research (PGfAR RP-PG-0608-10168, PGfAR RP-PG-0608-10168, PGfAR RP-PG-0608-10168, PGfAR RP-PG-0608-10168, PGfAR RP-PG-0608-10168, PGfAR RP-PG-0608-10168, PGfAR RP-PG-0608-10168, PGfAR RP-PG-0608-10168, PGfAR RP-PG-0608-10168, PGfAR RP-PG-0608-10168, PGfAR RP-PG-0608-10168)
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Defining a threshold for intervention in breast cancer-related lymphedema: what level of arm volume increase predicts progression?Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2013
- Incidence of unilateral arm lymphoedema after breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysisThe Lancet Oncology, 2013
- Time-Course of Arm Lymphedema and Potential Risk Factors for Progression of Lymphedema After Breast Conservation Treatment for Early Stage Breast CancerThe Breast Journal, 2012
- Standardized Method for Quantification of Developing Lymphedema in Patients Treated for Breast CancerInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 2010
- Lymphedema After Breast Cancer: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Effect on Upper Body FunctionJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2008
- Preoperative assessment enables the early diagnosis and successful treatment of lymphedemaCancer, 2008
- Surgical Complications Associated With Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy: Results From a Prospective International Cooperative Group TrialAnnals of Surgical Oncology, 2006
- A Comparison of Four Diagnostic Criteria for Lymphedema in a Post-Breast Cancer PopulationLymphatic Research and Biology, 2005
- A combination of distribution- and anchor-based approaches determined minimally important differences (MIDs) for four endpoints in a breast cancer scaleJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2004
- The validation of a quality of life scale to assess the impact of arm morbidity in breast cancer patients post-operativelyBreast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2001