How Are Landscapes under Agroecological Transition Perceived and Appreciated? A Belgian Case Study
Open Access
- 21 March 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in Sustainability
- Vol. 12 (6), 2480
- https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062480
Abstract
An increasing number of agricultural transition initiatives are taking place, seeking more autonomy and resilience on the farms. This undeniably reshapes the landscape and the delivery of ecosystem services (ES). To date, little research includes the knowledge and perceptions of local communities on rural landscapes in agricultural transition. Yet, farmers shape the landscape and ES delivery, and local inhabitants are directly impacted. The present work aims at assessing the extent to which locals (local inhabitants and farmers) appreciate and view landscapes undergoing agricultural transitions. To do so, questionnaires were submitted to locals enquiring about appreciation and ES perceptions of transitioning landscapes. These landscapes were shown in manipulated photographs simulating an agroecological landscape, a conventional agriculture landscape, and landscapes including each isolated agroecological practice (resulting in six ‘scenarios’). In order to put locals’ perceptions in perspective, the same questionnaire was submitted to ‘ES experts’, and ES perceptions were compared to field-based ES measurements in agroecological and conventional parcels of the same study region. The results show that locals and ES experts appreciate and perceive these scenarios similarly. The agroecological scenario was seen as the most appreciated and the one delivering the most ES, while the conventional one was the least appreciated and seen as the one delivering the least ES. These perceptions of ES delivery partially correspond to the ES field measurements, which showed a similar productivity within agroecological and conventional parcels and more regulating ES in agroecological parcels. We discuss how our results call for the assessment of the multi-performance of agricultural systems in terms of ES rather than focusing on yield only, and how future research addressing agroecological transition should rely on integrated valuations and mixed methods to better embrace the complexity of such transitioning systems.Keywords
Funding Information
- Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS (FRIA grant, CDR grant)
This publication has 62 references indexed in Scilit:
- Diversified Farming Systems: An Agroecological, Systems-based Alternative to Modern Industrial AgricultureEcology and Society, 2012
- Ecosystem Services in Biologically Diversified versus Conventional Farming Systems: Benefits, Externalities, and Trade-OffsEcology and Society, 2012
- Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agricultureProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2011
- Exploring public preferences for traditional farming landscapesLandscape and Urban Planning, 2011
- Farming without a recipe: Wisconsin graziers and new directions for agricultural scienceJournal of Rural Studies, 2011
- Ecosystem services and agriculture: tradeoffs and synergiesPhilosophical Transactions Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2010
- Evolutionary Influence on Human Landscape PreferenceEnvironment and Behavior, 2009
- Simultaneous Inference in General Parametric ModelsBiometrical Journal, 2008
- Commentary: The productivity of variability: an agroecological hypothesisInternational Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 2008
- Ecosystem services and dis-services to agricultureEcological Economics, 2007