Workplace absenteeism amongst patients undergoing open vs. robotic radical prostatectomy, hysterectomy, and partial colectomy
- 1 April 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Surgical Endoscopy
- Vol. 35 (4), 1644-1650
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07547-y
Abstract
Background There is controversy regarding the widespread uptake of robotic surgery across several surgical disciplines. While it has been shown to confer clinical benefits such as decreased blood loss and shorter hospital stays, some argue that the benefits of this technology do not outweigh its high cost. We performed a retrospective insurance-based analysis to investigate how undergoing robotic surgery, compared to open surgery, may impact the time in which an employed individual returns to work after undergoing major surgery. Methods We identified a cohort of US adults with employer-sponsored insurance using claims data from the MarketScan database who underwent either open or robotic radical prostatectomy, hysterectomy/myomectomy, and partial colectomy from 2012 to 2016. We performed multiple regression models incorporating propensity scores to assess the effect of robotic vs. open surgery on the number of absent days from work, adjusting for demographic characteristics and baseline absenteeism. Results In a cohort of 1157 individuals with employer-sponsored insurance, those undergoing open surgery, compared to robotic surgery, had 9.9 more absent workdays for radical prostatectomy (95%CI 5.0 to 14.7, p < 0.001), 25.3 for hysterectomy/myomectomy (95%CI 11.0-39.6, p < 0.001), and 29.8 for partial colectomy (95%CI 14.8-44.8, p < 0.001) Conclusion For the three major procedures studied, robotic surgery was associated with fewer missed days from work compared to open surgery. This information helps payers, patients, and providers better understand some of the indirect benefits of robotic surgery relative to its cost.Keywords
Funding Information
- Intuitive Surgical
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Past, the Present, and the Future of Robotic Urology: Robot-assisted Surgery and Human-assisted RobotsEuropean Urology Focus, 2018
- Effect of patient choice and hospital competition on service configuration and technology adoption within cancer surgery: a national, population-based studyThe Lancet Oncology, 2017
- Surgical and oncologic outcomes after robotic radical hysterectomy as compared to open radical hysterectomy in the treatment of early cervical cancerJournal of Gynecologic Oncology, 2017
- Comparison of open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches for total abdominal colectomySurgical Endoscopy, 2015
- Comparative Effectiveness of Robot-Assisted and Open Radical Prostatectomy in the Postdissemination EraJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2014
- A Comparison of Quality Outcome Measures in Patients Having a Hysterectomy for Benign Disease: Robotic vs. Non-robotic ApproachesJournal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 2014
- Outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Colorectal Surgery Compared with Laparoscopic and Open Surgery: a Systematic ReviewJournal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2014
- Robotic SurgeryJAMA, 2013
- Perioperative Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Compared With Open Radical Prostatectomy: Results From the Nationwide Inpatient SampleEuropean Urology, 2011
- Robotic Surgery — Squeezing into Tight PlacesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2006