A Comparison of Quality Outcome Measures in Patients Having a Hysterectomy for Benign Disease: Robotic vs. Non-robotic Approaches
- 1 May 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
- Vol. 21 (3), 389-393
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2013.10.008
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Robotically Assisted vs Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Among Women With Benign Gynecologic DiseaseJAMA, 2013
- The revolving door: Hospital readmissions of gynecologic oncology patientsGynecologic Oncology, 2011
- ACOG Committee Opinion No. 444: Choosing the Route of Hysterectomy for Benign DiseaseObstetrics & Gynecology, 2009
- Open Abdominal versus Laparoscopic and Vaginal Hysterectomy: Analysis of a Large United States Payer Measuring Quality and Cost of CareJournal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 2009
- Revisiting Readmissions — Changing the Incentives for Shared AccountabilityNew England Journal of Medicine, 2009
- Rehospitalizations among Patients in the Medicare Fee-for-Service ProgramNew England Journal of Medicine, 2009
- Collective Accountability for Medical Care — Toward Bundled Medicare PaymentsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2008
- Unplanned General Surgical Re-Admissions – How Many, Which Patients and Why?The Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2007
- Hysterectomy Rates for Benign IndicationsObstetrics & Gynecology, 2006
- Comorbidity Measures for Use with Administrative DataMedical Care, 1998