Hierarchies of evidence applied to lifestyle Medicine (HEALM): introduction of a strength-of-evidence approach based on a methodological systematic review
Open Access
- 20 August 2019
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Vol. 19 (1), 1-16
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0811-z
Abstract
Current methods for assessing strength of evidence prioritize the contributions of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The objective of this study was to characterize strength of evidence (SOE) tools in recent use, identify their application to lifestyle interventions for improved longevity, vitality, or successful aging, and to assess implications of the findings. The search strategy was created in PubMed and modified as needed for four additional databases: Embase, AnthropologyPlus, PsycINFO, and Ageline, supplemented by manual searching. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of intervention trials or observational studies relevant to lifestyle intervention were included if they used a specified SOE tool. Data was collected for each SOE tool. Conditions necessary for assigning the highest SOE grading and treatment of prospective cohort studies within each SOE rating framework were summarized. The expert panel convened to discuss the implications of findings for assessing evidence in the domain of lifestyle medicine. A total of 15 unique tools were identified. Ten were tools developed and used by governmental agencies or other equivalent professional bodies and were applicable in a variety of settings. Of these 10, four require consistent results from RCTs of high quality to award the highest rating of evidence. Most SOE tools include prospective cohort studies only to note their secondary contribution to overall SOE as compared to RCTs. We developed a new construct, Hierarchies of Evidence Applied to Lifestyle Medicine (HEALM), to illustrate the feasibility of a tool based on the specific contributions of diverse research methods to understanding lifetime effects of health behaviors. Assessment of evidence relevant to lifestyle medicine requires a potential adaptation of SOE approaches when outcomes and/or exposures obviate exclusive or preferential reliance on RCTs. This systematic review was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews, PROSPERO [CRD42018082148].Keywords
Funding Information
- American College of Lifestyle Medicine (No specific award number)
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (5U48DP005023-04)
This publication has 57 references indexed in Scilit:
- Lifestyle medicineCurrent Opinion in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Obesity, 2013
- Long-term dietary intervention trials: critical issues and challengesTrials, 2012
- From Randomized Controlled Trials to Observational StudiesAmerican Journal Of Medicine, 2009
- Going from evidence to recommendationsBMJ, 2008
- What is “quality of evidence” and why is it important to clinicians?BMJ, 2008
- In Defense of the Randomized Controlled Trial for Health Promotion ResearchAmerican Journal of Public Health, 2006
- Combined Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy and Cardiovascular Disease: Toward Resolving the Discrepancy between Observational Studies and the Women's Health Initiative Clinical TrialAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2005
- Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendationsBMJ, 2004
- Developing an evidence-based guide to community preventive services—methods11Some of this material has been previously published in: Shefer A, Briss P, Rodewald L, et al. Improving immunization coverage rates: An evidence-based review of the literature. Epidemiologic Reviews 1999;20:96–142.22The names and affiliations of the Task Force members are listed on page v of this supplement and at http://www.thecommunityguide.orgAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2000
- Best evidence synthesis: An intelligent alternative to meta-analysisJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1995