Global Assessment of Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Skills (GAGES): a valid measurement tool for technical skills in flexible endoscopy
- 29 January 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Surgical Endoscopy
- Vol. 24 (8), 1834-1841
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-0882-8
Abstract
Simulators may improve the efficiency, safety, and quality of endoscopic training. However, no objective, reliable, and valid tool exists to assess clinical endoscopic skills. Such a tool to measure the outcomes of educational strategies is a necessity. This multicenter, multidisciplinary trial aimed to develop instruments for evaluating basic flexible endoscopic skills and to demonstrate their reliability and validity. The Global Assessment of Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Skills (GAGES) Upper Endoscopy (GAGES-UE) and Colonoscopy (GAGES-C) are rating scales developed by expert endoscopists. The GAGES scale was completed by the attending endoscopist (A) and an observer (O) in self-assessment (S) during procedures to establish interrater reliability (IRR, using the intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]) and internal consistency (IC, using Cronbach’s alpha). Instrumentation was evaluated when possible and correlated with total scores. Construct and external validity were examined by comparing novice (NOV) and experienced (EXP) endoscopists (Student’s t-test). Correlations were calculated for GAGES-UE and GAGES-C with participants who had performed both. For the 139 completed evaluations (60 NOV, 79 EXP), IRR (A vs. O) was 0.96 for GAGES-UE and 0.97 for GAGES-C. The IRR between S and A was 0.78 for GAGES-UE and 0.89 for GAGES-C. The IC was 0.89 for GAGES-UE, and 0.95 for GAGES-C. There were mean differences between the NOV and the EXP endoscopists for GAGE-UE (14.4 ± 3.7 vs. 18.5 ± 1.6; p < 0.001) and GAGE-C (11.8 ± 3.8 vs. 18.8 ± 1.3; p < 0.001). Good correlation was found between the scores for the GAGE-UE and the GAGE-C (r = 0.75; n = 37). Instrumentation, when performed, demonstrated correlations with total scores of 0.84 (GAGE-UE; n = 73) and 0.86 (GAGE-C; n = 45). The GAGES-UE and GAGES-C are easy to administer and consistent and meet high standards of reliability and validity. They can be used to measure the effectiveness of simulator training and to provide specific feedback. The GAGES results can be generalized to North American and European endoscopists and may contribute to the definition of technical proficiency in endoscopy.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- FLS simulator performance predicts intraoperative laparoscopic skillSurgical Endoscopy, 2007
- Expert and construct validity of the Simbionix GI Mentor II endoscopy simulator for colonoscopySurgical Endoscopy, 2007
- A comparative study of skills in virtual laparoscopy and endoscopySurgical Endoscopy, 2004
- Learning curves and impact of psychomotor training on performance in simulated colonoscopy: a randomized trial using a virtual reality endoscopy trainerSurgical Endoscopy, 2004
- Validity and reliability of a virtual reality upper gastrointestinal simulator and cross validation using structured assessment of individual performance with video playbackSurgical Endoscopy, 2004
- A study to validate the colonoscopy simulatorSurgical Endoscopy, 2003
- The PreOp flexible sigmoidoscopy trainerSurgical Endoscopy, 2002
- Evaluation of endoscopic and laparoscopic training practices in surgical residency programsSurgical Endoscopy, 2001
- A prospective analysis of 13,580 colonoscopiesSurgical Endoscopy, 2001
- Acquisition of Competency in Endsocopic Skills (ACES) during training: Early results of a multicenter studyGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1995