PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL, PROMOTION AND THE COURTS: A CRITICAL REVIEW
- 1 March 1981
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Personnel Psychology
- Vol. 34 (1), 103-121
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1981.tb02181.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- THE STATISTICAL DEFINITION OF FAIRNESS IN THE FEDERAL SELECTION GUIDELINES AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR MINORITY EMPLOYMENTPersonnel Psychology, 1979
- EVEN MORE IDEAS ABOUT METHODOLOGIES FOR DETERMINING JOB DIFFERENCES AND SIMILARITIESPersonnel Psychology, 1979
- THREE FLIES IN THE OINTMENT: A REPLY TO ARVEY AND MOSSHOLDERPersonnel Psychology, 1979
- Longitudinal study of the effects of rater training on psychometric error in ratings.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1979
- Comparison of training methods for improving the psychometric quality of experimental and administrative performance ratings.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1979
- ASSESSING CONTENT VALIDITY: STANDARDS SET BY THE COURT1Personnel Psychology, 1978
- Differential and single-group validity of employment tests by race: A critical analysis of three recent studies.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1978
- BEHAVIORALLY ANCHORED RATING SCALES: A REVIEW OF THE LITERATUREPersonnel Psychology, 1975
- Criterion models and construct validity for criteria.Psychological Bulletin, 1973
- Issues in managerial performance: Multitrait-multimethod analyses of ratings.Psychological Bulletin, 1971