A comparison of two fouling‐resistant heat exchangers

Abstract

Fouling cannot always be prevented; it is important to consider the design of fouling‐resistant heat exchangers. To examine these exchangers, a test fluid whose fouling behaviour is understood should be used. Experiments have been conducted to examine the response of two model systems, a pulsatile flow and a fluid bed heat exchanger, to fouling from whey protein concentrates. Both systems are effective in certain cases, although the enhanced mass transfer possible in the pulsatile flow exchanger can increase fouling when mass transfer controls deposition. This demonstrates the possible danger in installing “antifouling”; systems. The possible mechanisms by which antifouling exchangers operate is discussed; they may work both by slowing the kinetics of fouling or enhancing the heat transfer coefficient. A simple model to demonstrate the design of antifouling exchangers is presented.