Mild depression in general practice: time for a rethink?
- 1 August 2003
- journal article
- review article
- Published by BMJ in Drug and Therapeutics Bulletin
- Vol. 41 (8), 60-64
- https://doi.org/10.1136/dtb.2003.41860
Abstract
Clinical studies, conducted chiefly in hospital settings, have demonstrated that antidepressant drug therapy is effective treatment for major depressive disorder of at least moderate severity,1 and that cognitive therapy is an effective alternative to antidepressants in mild to moderate major depression.2 However, few clinical trials have taken place in general practice, where the great majority of patients with depression are managed. Most such patients in this setting do not meet diagnostic criteria for major depression,3,4 and are often described more loosely as having 'mild depression'. Many are given an antidepressant, often as the first step in treatment.5 Here, we consider whether this is the optimal approach for adults with mild depression in general practice.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effect of Hypericum perforatum (St John's Wort) in Major Depressive DisorderJAMA, 2002
- Effectiveness of St John's Wort in Major DepressionJAMA, 2001
- Treatment of Dysthymia and Minor Depression in Primary CareJAMA, 2000
- Outcomes of recognized and unrecognized depression in an international primary care studyGeneral Hospital Psychiatry, 1999
- Differences between detected and undetected patients in primary care and depressed psychiatric patientsGeneral Hospital Psychiatry, 1996
- Treating Major Depression in Primary Care PracticeArchives of General Psychiatry, 1996
- Prevalence, nature, and comorbidity of depressive disorders in primary careGeneral Hospital Psychiatry, 1994
- The Functioning and Well-being of Depressed PatientsJAMA, 1989
- Predictors of therapeutic benefit from amitriptyline in mild depression: a general practice placebo-controlled trialJournal of Affective Disorders, 1988