Collaborating with healthcare providers to understand their perspectives on a hospital-to-home warning signs intervention for rural transitional care: protocol of a multimethod descriptive study
Open Access
- 1 April 2020
- Vol. 10 (4), e034698
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034698
Abstract
Introduction This study builds on our prior research, which identified that older rural patients and families (1) view preparation for detecting and responding to worsening health conditions as their most pressing unmet transitional care (TC) need and (2) perceive an evidence-based intervention, preparing them to detect and respond to warning signs of worsening health conditions, as highly likely to meet this need. Yet, what healthcare providers need to implement a warning signs intervention in rural TC is unclear. The objectives of this study are (1) to examine healthcare providers' perspectives on the acceptability of a warning signs intervention and (2) to identify barriers and facilitators to healthcare providers' provision of the intervention in rural communities. Methods and analysis This multimethod descriptive study uses a community-based, participatory research approach. We will examine healthcare providers' perspectives on a warning signs intervention. A purposive, criterion-based sample of healthcare providers stratified by professional designation (three strata: nurses, physicians and allied healthcare professionals) in two regions (Southwestern and Northeastern Ontario, Canada) will (1) rate the acceptability of the intervention and (2) participate in small (n=4-6 healthcare providers), semistructured telephone focus group discussions on barriers and facilitators to delivering the intervention in rural communities. Two to three focus groups per stratum will be held in each region for a total of 12-18 focus groups. Data will be analysed using conventional qualitative content analysis and descriptive statistics. Ethics and dissemination Ethics approval was obtained from the Office of Research Ethics at York University and the Health Sciences North Research Ethics Board. Findings will be communicated through plain language summary and policy briefs, press releases, manuscripts and conferences.Keywords
Funding Information
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (163072)
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- Understanding the barriers to setting up a healthcare quality improvement process in resource-limited settings: a situational analysis at the Medical Department of Kamuzu Central Hospital in Lilongwe, MalawiBMC Health Services Research, 2014
- Effectiveness of early discharge planning in acutely ill or injured hospitalized older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysisBMC Geriatrics, 2013
- A New Multimodal Geriatric Discharge-Planning Intervention to Prevent Emergency Visits and Rehospitalizations of Older Adults: The Optimization of Medication in AGEd Multicenter Randomized Controlled TrialJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2011
- What about N? A methodological study of sample-size reporting in focus group studiesBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2011
- Evaluation of exposure-specific risks from two independent samples: A simulation studyBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2011
- Outcomes for Implementation Research: Conceptual Distinctions, Measurement Challenges, and Research AgendaAdministration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 2010
- Designing and evaluating complex interventions to improve health careBMJ, 2007
- The Care Transitions InterventionArchives of Internal Medicine, 2006
- Three Approaches to Qualitative Content AnalysisQualitative Health Research, 2005
- Preparing Patients and Caregivers to Participate in Care Delivered Across Settings: The Care Transitions InterventionJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2004