Schools of Planning Thought: Exploring Differences through Similarities
- 1 November 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Informa UK Limited in International Planning Studies
- Vol. 15 (4), 269-280
- https://doi.org/10.1080/13563475.2010.517286
Abstract
A core concern of all planning theory is properly linking knowledge to action. Using this core concern as the base for analysis, this paper examines the nature of underlying differences among contemporary schools of planning. The analysis centres on four general concerns of planning: its guiding purpose, the role of the planner, knowledge of the future, and knowledge of the public interest. The results highlight areas of debate among schools of planning thought, and suggest a separation between knowledge and action. In turn, the method of analysis demonstrates that using similarities as themes that cut across schools of planning thought helps to advance a theoretical understanding of planning as a social phenomenon.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Planning and its Orientation to the FutureInternational Planning Studies, 2009
- Planning rights and their ImplicationsPlanning Theory, 2007
- Response to ‘ Why Do Planning Theory? ’Planning Theory, 2003
- Why Do Planning Theory?Planning Theory, 2003
- The Public Interest in Planning: From Legitimation to Substantive Plan EvaluationPlanning Theory, 2002
- Thinking about TomorrowBringing the Future to the Forefront of PlanningJournal of the American Planning Association, 2001
- Dare to Dream:Bringing Futures into PlanningJournal of the American Planning Association, 2001
- Moral Obligations, Planning, and the Public Interest: A Commentary on Current British PracticeEnvironment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 2000
- The Autopoiesis of Administrative Systems: Niklas Luhmann on Public Administration and Public PolicyPublic Administration, 1997
- Dare to plan: an essay on the role of the future in planning practice and educationTown Planning Review, 1985