Identifying Patients With Severe Sepsis Using Administrative Claims
Top Cited Papers
- 1 June 2014
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Medical Care
- Vol. 52 (6), e39-e43
- https://doi.org/10.1097/mlr.0b013e318268ac86
Abstract
Background: Severe sepsis is a common and costly problem. Although consistently defined clinically by consensus conference since 1991, there have been several different implementations of the severe sepsis definition using ICD-9-CM codes for research. We conducted a single center, patient-level validation of 1 common implementation of the severe sepsis definition, the so-called “Angus” implementation. Methods: Administrative claims for all hospitalizations for patients initially admitted to general medical services from an academic medical center in 2009–2010 were reviewed. On the basis of ICD-9-CM codes, hospitalizations were sampled for review by 3 internal medicine-trained hospitalists. Chart reviews were conducted with a structured instrument, and the gold standard was the hospitalists’ summary clinical judgment on whether the patient had severe sepsis. Results: Three thousand one hundred forty-six (13.5%) hospitalizations met ICD-9-CM criteria for severe sepsis by the Angus implementation (Angus-positive) and 20,142 (86.5%) were Angus-negative. Chart reviews were performed for 92 randomly selected Angus-positive and 19 randomly-selected Angus-negative hospitalizations. Reviewers had a κ of 0.70. The Angus implementation’s positive predictive value was 70.7% [95% confidence interval (CI): 51.2%, 90.5%]. The negative predictive value was 91.5% (95% CI: 79.0%, 100%). The sensitivity was 50.4% (95% CI: 14.8%, 85.7%). Specificity was 96.3% (95% CI: 92.4%, 100%). Two alternative ICD-9-CM implementations had high positive predictive values but sensitivities of <20%. Conclusions: The Angus implementation of the international consensus conference definition of severe sepsis offers a reasonable but imperfect approach to identifying patients with severe sepsis when compared with a gold standard of structured review of the medical chart by trained hospitalists.Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Incident Stroke and Mortality Associated With New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation in Patients Hospitalized With Severe SepsisJAMA, 2011
- Long-term Cognitive Impairment and Functional Disability Among Survivors of Severe SepsisJAMA, 2010
- Toward an Integrated Research Agenda for Critical Illness in AgingAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2010
- Racial Variation in the Incidence, Care, and Outcomes of Severe SepsisAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2008
- 2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS International Sepsis Definitions ConferenceIntensive Care Medicine, 2003
- Further evidence concerning the use of a clinical comorbidity index with ICD-9-CM administrative dataJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1993
- Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative data: A responseJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1993
- Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative data: A responseJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1993
- Presentation adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative data: Differing perspectivesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1993
- Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databasesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1992