On the conjunction fallacy in probability judgment: New experimental evidence regarding Linda
- 26 September 2009
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Games and Economic Behavior
- Vol. 68 (2), 551-556
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2009.09.003
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Group Identity and Social PreferencesAmerican Economic Review, 2009
- On the Conjunction Fallacy in Probability Judgment: New Experimental EvidenceSSRN Electronic Journal, 2008
- Individual Behavior and Group MembershipAmerican Economic Review, 2007
- Are Two Heads Better Than One? Team versus Individual Play in Signaling GamesAmerican Economic Review, 2005
- Does Market Experience Eliminate Market Anomalies?The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2003
- Are humans good intuitive statisticians after all? Rethinking some conclusions from the literature on judgment under uncertaintyCognition, 1996
- Interaction with Others Increases Decision Confidence but Not Decision Quality: Evidence against Information Collection Views of Interactive Decision MakingOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1995
- Some compelling intuitions about group consensus decisions, theoretical and empirical research, and interpersonal aggregation phenomena: Selected examples 1950–1990Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1992
- Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment.Psychological Review, 1983
- Social categorization and intergroup behaviourEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 1971