Fun and Games
- 1 March 1978
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Conflict Resolution
- Vol. 22 (1), 7-38
- https://doi.org/10.1177/002200277802200102
Abstract
The validity of gaming techniques has come under increasing attack in recent years The present article examines claims for and criticisms of the use of games in the study of conflict. Gaming proponents have cited four major functions of games: (a) an analogy, or model, of actual conflict situations, (b) a heuristic device to provide new ways of thinking, (c) a device to separate rational solutions to conflict from those affected by psychological and sociological factors, and (d) a simple experimental tool to test theoretically relevant hypotheses about conflict. Critics have attacked the use of games by pointing out (a) the triviality of game results, (b) a possible lack of reproducibility of the findings, (c) the difficulty of relating game choices to motivation, (d) the inappropriateness of many generalizations made from such studies, (e) the nondynamic nature of the game situation, and (f) the lack of isomorphism between game situations and naturally occurnng conflicts. Examination of these advantages and criticisms allowed their differentiation into questions of internal validity, external validity, and ecological (real world) validity The most potent criticisms of games are directed at the ecological validity issue. It is the contention of the present paper that ecological validity raises questions for the evaluation of theories of conflict, not for the evaluation of gaming paradigms that permit the study of conflict.Keywords
This publication has 63 references indexed in Scilit:
- The crisis of confidence in social psychology.American Psychologist, 1975
- A Methodology for the Study of Individual and Social Choice BehaviourJournal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 1975
- A paradigm for the study of coercive powerJournal of Conflict Resolution, 1971
- A comparative experimental study of negotiation behavior.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1970
- A comparison of interpreted and abstract versions of mixed-motive games:Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1970
- Exploiter, leader, hero, and martyr: The four archetypes of the 2 × 2 gameBehavioral Science, 1967
- Personality and attitudinal correlates of trusting and trustworthy behaviors in a two-person game.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1966
- Effects of increased incentives upon the use of threat in bargaining.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1966
- Effect of unilateral promise and value of rewards upon cooperation and trust.The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1964
- The Effect of Motivational Orientation upon Trust and SuspicionHuman Relations, 1960