Prognostication during physician-family discussions about limiting life support in intensive care units*
- 1 February 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Critical Care Medicine
- Vol. 35 (2), 442-448
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ccm.0000254723.28270.14
Abstract
Prognostic information is important to the family members of incapacitated, critically ill patients, yet little is known about what prognostic information physicians provide. Our objectives were to determine the types of prognostic information provided to families of critically ill patients when making major end-of-life treatment decisions and to identify factors associated with more physician prognostication. Multiple-center, cross-sectional study. ICUs of four hospitals. Thirty-five physicians, 51 patients, and 169 family members. We audiotaped 51 physician-family conferences in which there were deliberations about major end-of-life treatment decisions at four hospitals in 2000-2002. Conferences were coded to identify the types of prognostic information provided by physicians. We used a mixed-effects regression model to identify factors associated with more prognostication by physicians. The mean number of prognostic statements per conference was 9.4+/-6.4 (range 0-29). Eighty-six percent of conferences contained discussion of the patient's anticipated functional status or quality of life, compared with 63% in which the chances for survival were discussed (p=.01). There were significantly more statements about prognosis for functional outcomes per conference compared with statements about prognosis for survival (median 4 [interquartile range 2-8] vs. 1 [interquartile range 0-3]; p<.001). Increasing educational level of the family was independently associated with more prognostic statements by physicians (p<.001) as was the degree of physician-family conflict about withdrawing life support (p<.001) and the physician's race being white (p=.009). Prognostication occurred frequently during physician-family deliberations about whether to forego life support, but physicians did not discuss the patient's prognosis for survival in more than one third of conferences. Less educated families received less information about prognosis. Future studies should address whether these observations partially explain the high prevalence of family misunderstandings about prognosis in intensive care units.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Communication of end-of-life decisions in European intensive care unitsIntensive Care Medicine, 2005
- Challenges in End-of-Life Care in the ICU: Statement of the 5th International Consensus Conference in Critical Care: Brussels, Belgium, April 2003: Executive SummaryCritical Care Medicine, 2004
- Challenges in end-of-life care in the ICUIntensive Care Medicine, 2004
- Use of intensive care at the end of life in the United States: An epidemiologic study*Critical Care Medicine, 2004
- Opinions about surrogate designation: A population survey in France*Critical Care Medicine, 2003
- The seriously ill hospitalized patient: Preferred role in end-of-life decision making?Journal of Critical Care, 2003
- Decision-making in the ICU: perspectives of the substitute decision-makerIntensive Care Medicine, 2003
- French intensivists do not apply American recommendations regarding decisions to forgo life-sustaining therapyCritical Care Medicine, 2001
- What do we mean by partnership in making decisions about treatment?BMJ, 1999
- A National Survey of End-of-life Care for Critically Ill PatientsAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 1998