Oral Peanut Challenge Identifies an Allergy but the Peanut Allergen Threshold Sensitivity Is Not Reproducible
Open Access
- 9 January 2013
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 8 (1), e53465
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053465
Abstract
Double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge, DBPCFC, the gold standard for diagnosing food allergy, is time-consuming and potentially dangerous. A basophil allergen threshold sensitivity test, CD-sens, has shown promising results as a diagnostic tool in food allergy. To evaluate the reproducibility of oral peanut challenge and compare the outcome to CD-sens in peanut-sensitized children. Twenty-seven children (4–19 years) underwent a DBPCFC followed by a single-blind oral food-challenge. The peanut challenges (1 mg to 5 g) were evaluated by severity scoring. Blood samples were drawn for CD-sens before the two first challenges. Thirteen children (48%) did not react at any of the challenges. Fourteen reacted at both peanut challenges but not to placebo. Only two of these children reacted at the same threshold dose and with the same severity score. All other children scored differently or reacted at different doses. For children with a positive challenge the geometric mean of the ratio of the doses was 1.834 (p = 0.307) and the arithmetic mean of the difference between the severity scores was 0.143 (p = 0.952). No association was obtained between the two peanut challenges regarding severity score (rs = 0.11, p = 0.71) or threshold dose (rs = 0.35, p = 0.22). Among the children positive in peanut challenge, 12 were positive in CD-sens. Two were low-responders and could not be evaluated. Geometric mean of the ratio of CD-sens values in children with a positive challenge was 1.035 (p = 0.505) but unlike for the severity score and the threshold dose the association between the two CD-sens values was strong (rs = 0.94, P<0.001). For a positive/negative test the reproducibility is 100% for both peanut challenge and CD-sens. However, a comparison of the degree of allergen threshold sensitivity between the two tests is not possible since the threshold dose and severity scoring is not reproducible.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Food allergy: diagnosis and beyondAnnals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, 2012
- Clinical thresholds to egg, hazelnut, milk and peanut: results from a single-center study using standardized challengesAnnals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, 2012
- Basophil allergen threshold sensitivity, CD‐sens, IgE‐sensitization and DBPCFC in peanut‐sensitized childrenAllergy, 2011
- The eliciting dose of peanut in double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges decreases with increasing age and specific IgE level in children and young adultsJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2011
- Basophil allergen threshold sensitivity, CD-sens, is a measure of allergen sensitivity in asthmaClinical and Experimental Allergy, 2011
- Prevalence of challenge-proven IgE-mediated food allergy using population-based sampling and predetermined challenge criteria in infantsJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2011
- Human basophils: a unique biological instrument to detect the allergenicity of food.2011
- Diagnosis of Food Allergy: Epicutaneous Skin Tests, In Vitro Tests, and Oral Food ChallengeCurrent Allergy and Asthma Reports, 2010
- Evaluation of IgE-Mediated Food HypersensitivitiesJournal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, 2000
- Double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) as an office procedure: A manualJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 1988