Anxiolytic Effect of Progesterone is Mediated by the Neurosteroid Allopregnanolone at Brain GABAA Receptors

Abstract
Previous studies from this laboratory have shown that progesterone (PROG) treatment in ovariectomized rats produces an anti‐anxiety response similar to that observed after the administration of prototypical anxiolytic benzodiazepine (BDZ) compounds. The PROG‐induced anxiolytic response was highly correlated with an increased level of 3α‐hydroxy‐5α‐pregnan‐20‐one (allopregnanolone) in the blood and brain, and was also associated with a facilitation of GABA‐stimulated chloride ion (Cl) influx in cortical synaptoneurosomes. This correlative evidence suggested that the anxiolytic effect of PROG was a result of its in vivo reduction to the neuroactive steroid, allopregnanolone. In this report, a series of studies was conducted to determine the mechanism(s) by which PROG alters behavior in animal models of anxiety. In the first experiment, ovariectomized rats were injected with PROG (1 mg/0.2 ml, SC) 4 h prior to a test in the elevated plus‐maze. Some animals also received an injection of picrotoxin (0.75 mg/kg, IP), a GABAA receptor‐gated Cl channel antagonist, whereas other animals were pretreated with RU 38486 (5 mg/0.2 ml, SC), a progestin receptor antagonist. PROG elicited anxiolytic behavior in the plus‐maze, an effect that was blocked by picrotoxin administration. Pretreatment with RU 38486 was not effective in altering PROG‐induced anxiolytic behavior in the plus‐maze. In a second experiment, the effect of PROG on behavior in the plus‐maze was determined in the presence of N,N‐diethyl‐4‐methyl‐3‐oxo‐4‐aza‐5α‐androstane‐17β‐carboxamide (4‐MA; 10 mg/0.2 ml, SC), a 5α‐reductase inhibitor. The enzyme inhibitor was potent in preventing the anxiolytic effect observed in the plus‐maze after PROG administration. In the defensive burying paradigm, PROG treatment also produced anxiolysis by reducing the duration of burying behavior, and this effect was prevented by 4‐MA pretreatment, but not by RU 38486 administration. After the completion of the behavioral assays, analysis of blood allopregnanolone levels revealed a marked increase in PROG‐treated females. The PROG‐induced elevation in circulating allopregnanolone was blocked by pretreatment with 4‐MA. In cortical synaptoneurosomes, the sensitivity (inverse of the EC50) and the maximal response (Emax) in GABA‐stimulated 36Cl uptake were increased in PROG‐treated females. The potentiation of PROG on both of these neurochemical measures was not observed in animals pretreated with 4‐MA. Together, these studies provide evidence that the anxiolytic effect of PROG is not associated with an intracellular steroid receptor that initiates genomic‐mediated responses. The evidence is consistent with a nongenomic mechanism whereby PROG is metabolized to allopregnanolone, a neuroactive steroid that potentiates GABAA receptor‐mediated responses.