Intravenous Fluids Cause Systemic Bias in a Conductivity-Based Point-of-Care Hematocrit Meter
- 1 February 2012
- journal article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Anesthesia & Analgesia
- Vol. 114 (2), 314-321
- https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0b013e31823fecbd
Abstract
Point-of-care (POC) devices measuring hematocrit rely on determination of electrical conductivity of whole blood. We hypothesized that some frequently administered IV fluids independently alter blood conductivity and confound hematocrit determination. Whole human blood was diluted to predetermined hematocrit values with normal saline, lactated Ringer solution, hetastarch, or plasma. Electrical conductivity and hematocrit (i-STAT® and spun methods) were measured at each dilution. In separate experiments, the effects of propofol and heparin were noted on these variables. Greater dilution significantly increased conductivity irrespective of diluent type. The magnitude of the conductivity slopes increased in order for plasma, hetastarch, lactated Ringer solution, and normal saline dilution. Moreover, each slope varied from every other slope (all P < 0.0001), and 94.2% of hematocrit values measured by i-STAT (n = 211 of 224) were less than those for the spun method. Dilution with plasma, normal saline, lactated Ringer solution, and hetastarch caused bias (Bland-Altman limits of agreement) of −2.7% (−6.9/1.4), −4.6% (−7.3/−2.0), −4.8% (−7.8/−1.7), and −2.0% (−5.6/1.9), respectively. The Cohen κ agreement values (5th–95th confidence interval) for a transfusion trigger of 30% were 0.90 (all values, 0.85–0.95), 0.25 (hematocrit <30%, 0.02–0.48), and 0.21 (hematocrit 18%–30%, 0.01–0.42). Clinically relevant concentrations of propofol and heparin had minimal effects on electrical conductivity or hematocrit determination. Dilution of blood with frequently used IV solutions affects whole blood conductivity determinations and thereby decreases hematocrits measured by a POC device relying on this method as compared with spun hematocrit. Conductivity-based hematocrit POC devices should be cautiously interpreted when hemodilution is present.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Let's Think Clinically Instead of Mathematically About Device AccuracyAnesthesia & Analgesia, 2011
- Laboratory point-of-care monitoring in the operating roomCurrent Opinion In Anesthesiology, 2010
- Practice Guidelines for Perioperative Blood Transfusion and Adjuvant TherapiesAnesthesiology, 2006
- An Accuracy Evaluation of the T-Line® Tensymeter (Continuous Noninvasive Blood Pressure Management Device) versus Conventional Invasive Radial Artery Monitoring in Surgical PatientsAnesthesia & Analgesia, 2006
- Electrical impedance and haematocrit of human blood with various anticoagulantsPhysiological Measurement, 1993
- Blood flow imaging using electrical impedance tomographyClinical Physics and Physiological Measurement, 1992
- A Comparison of Conductivity-Based Hematocrit Determinations With Conventional Laboratory Methods in Autologous Blood TransfusionsAnesthesia & Analgesia, 1990
- Evaluating Clinical Accuracy of Systems for Self-Monitoring of Blood GlucoseDiabetes Care, 1987
- STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTThe Lancet, 1986
- A Mathematical Treatment of the Electric Conductivity and Capacity of Disperse Systems I. The Electric Conductivity of a Suspension of Homogeneous SpheroidsPhysical Review B, 1924