Mighty Crime Victims: Victims' Rights and Neoliberalism in the American Conjuncture
- 4 March 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Informa UK Limited in Cultural Studies
- Vol. 28 (5-6), 911-946
- https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2014.886485
Abstract
Over the last 30 years, the victims' rights movement has expanded the role of victims in the American criminal justice system. As a result of this movement, judges, prosecutors and parole boards must now hear victims' views at all stages of the criminal justice process, including plea bargains, and sentencing and parole decisions. Legislative efforts have been spearheaded by victims' families, and legislation has been named after deceased victims. Also, victims' families can now view executions in states across the country. The victims' right movement assumes that the criminal justice system should privilege victims' interests over those of society. In so doing, it denies society as a consideration, which is tantamount to a denial of society itself. This article positions victims' rights' denial of society within the current conjuncture, marked as it is by the contradiction between neoliberalism and American liberalism. Victims' rights' denial of society is an expression of the denial of society implicit in American neoliberalism, which seeks to privilege individual interests over those of society. This paper argues that victims' rights is a powerful element of the neoliberal project for three reasons. First, victims' rights imputes the authority of legal discourse to neoliberalism's denial of society. Second, important actors in the rise of neoliberalism have also worked to establish victims' rights. Finally, victims' rights comprehensively circulates throughout America and offers powerful points of identification that incorporate Americans into the victims' rights formation. I explore the denial of society in three victims' rights practices: naming criminal legislation after crime victims and passing such laws in honour of victims; allowing victims' families to view executions; and prosecutors, judges and police personnel making legal decisions according to victims' wishes. I examine the consonant denial of society in three neoliberal practices – monetarism, supply-side economics and welfare reform – and demonstrate how neoliberal advocates like Bill Clinton, Ronald Reagan and Paul Gann worked to advance victims' rights. I also describe the production, consumption and comprehensive circulation of victims' rights texts. Finally, I consider Cultural Studies' unique contribution to legal studies.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- SurrenderPublished by University of Michigan Library ,2017
- Tax and SpendPublished by University of Pennsylvania Press ,2012
- Neoliberalism Resurgent? Market Rule after the Great RecessionSouth Atlantic Quarterly, 2012
- The neoliberal policy paradigm and the great recessionPanoeconomicus, 2012
- THE NEO-LIBERAL REVOLUTIONCultural Studies, 2011
- DOES CULTURAL STUDIES HAVE FUTURES? SHOULD IT? (OR WHAT'S THE MATTER WITH NEW YORK?)Cultural Studies, 2006
- Great TransformationsPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,2002
- Is there a Cultural Studies of Law?Published by Wiley ,2001
- The death of the social? Re-figuring the territory of governmentEconomy and Society, 1996
- Family Law under the Thatcher GovernmentJournal of Law and Society, 1990