A Laboratory-Based Evaluation of Four Rapid Point-of-Care Tests for Syphilis
Open Access
- 11 March 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 9 (3), e91504
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0091504
Abstract
Syphilis point-of-care tests may reduce morbidity and ongoing transmission by increasing the proportion of people rapidly treated. Syphilis stage and co-infection with HIV may influence test performance. We evaluated four commercially available syphilis point-of-care devices in a head-to-head comparison using sera from laboratories in Australia. Point-of-care tests were evaluated using sera stored at Sydney and Melbourne laboratories. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated by standard methods, comparing point-of-care results to treponemal immunoassay (IA) reference test results. Additional analyses by clinical syphilis stage, HIV status, and non-treponemal antibody titre were performed. Non-overlapping 95% confidence intervals (CI) were considered statistically significant differences in estimates. In total 1203 specimens were tested (736 IA-reactive, 467 IA-nonreactive). Point-of-care test sensitivities were: Determine 97.3%(95%CI:95.8–98.3), Onsite 92.5%(90.3–94.3), DPP 89.8%(87.3–91.9) and Bioline 87.8%(85.1–90.0). Specificities were: Determine 96.4%(94.1–97.8), Onsite 92.5%(90.3–94.3), DPP 98.3%(96.5–99.2), and Bioline 98.5%(96.8–99.3). Sensitivity of the Determine test was 100% for primary and 100% for secondary syphilis. The three other tests had reduced sensitivity among primary (80.4–90.2%) compared to secondary syphilis (94.3–98.6%). No significant differences in sensitivity were observed by HIV status. Test sensitivities were significantly higher among high-RPR titre (RPR≥8) (range: 94.6–99.5%) than RPR non-reactive infections (range: 76.3–92.9%). The Determine test had the highest sensitivity overall. All tests were most sensitive among high-RPR titre infections. Point-of-care tests have a role in syphilis control programs however in developed countries with established laboratory infrastructures, the lower sensitivities of some tests observed in primary syphilis suggest these would need to be supplemented with additional tests among populations where syphilis incidence is high to avoid missing early syphilis cases.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Are Treponema pallidum Specific Rapid and Point-of-Care Tests for Syphilis Accurate Enough for Screening in Resource Limited Settings? Evidence from a Meta-AnalysisPLOS ONE, 2013
- Point-of-Care Tests to Strengthen Health Systems and Save Newborn Lives: The Case of SyphilisPLoS Medicine, 2012
- Novel Point-of-Care Test for Simultaneous Detection of Nontreponemal and Treponemal Antibodies in Patients with SyphilisJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2010
- Cost-Effectiveness of Rapid Point-of-Care Prenatal Syphilis Screening in Sub-Saharan AfricaSexually Transmitted Diseases, 2008
- High rates of sexually transmitted infections in HIV positive homosexual men: data from two community based cohortsSexually Transmitted Infections, 2007
- Rapid tests for sexually transmitted infections (STIs): the way forwardSexually Transmitted Infections, 2006
- A multi-centre evaluation of nine rapid, point-of-care syphilis tests using archived seraSexually Transmitted Infections, 2006
- Diagnostic accuracy of a point-of-care syphilis test when used among pregnant women in BoliviaSexually Transmitted Infections, 2006
- Prospective, multi-centre clinic-based evaluation of four rapid diagnostic tests for syphilisSexually Transmitted Infections, 2006
- Modelling the cost-effectiveness of introducing rapid syphilis tests into an antenatal syphilis screening programme in Mwanza, TanzaniaSexually Transmitted Infections, 2006