Continuous versus interrupted perineal repair with standard or rapidly absorbed sutures after spontaneous vaginal birth: a randomised controlled trial
- 29 June 2002
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Elsevier BV in The Lancet
- Vol. 359 (9325), 2217-2223
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(02)09312-1
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Choosing caesarean sectionThe Lancet, 2000
- Repair of perineal traumaPublished by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,2000
- A randomised controlled trial of care of the perineum during second stage of normal labourBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1998
- The Ipswich Childbirth Study: 1. A randomised evaluation of two stage postpartum perineal repair leaving the skin unsuturedBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1998
- New VICRYL* formulation: an improved method of perineal repair?British Journal of Midwifery, 1996
- Can the suturing method make a difference in postpartum perineal pain?Journal of Nurse-Midwifery, 1990
- The choice of suture materials and techniques for repair of perineal trauma: an overview of the evidence from controlled trialsBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1989
- The Southmead perineal suture study. A randomized comparison of suture materials and suturing techniques for repair of perineal traumaBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1989
- West Berkshire perineal management trial.BMJ, 1984
- Evaluation of the rucker method of episiotomy repair as to perineal painThe American Journal of Surgery, 1951