Performance of a guideline-recommended algorithm for prognostication of poor neurological outcome after cardiac arrest
Open Access
- 3 June 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Intensive Care Medicine
- Vol. 46 (10), 1852-1862
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-020-06080-9
Abstract
Purpose To assess the performance of a 4-step algorithm for neurological prognostication after cardiac arrest recommended by the European Resuscitation Council (ERC) and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM). Methods Retrospective descriptive analysis with data from the Target Temperature Management (TTM) Trial. Associations between predicted and actual neurological outcome were investigated for each step of the algorithm with results from clinical neurological examinations, neuroradiology (CT or MRI), neurophysiology (EEG and SSEP) and serum neuron-specific enolase. Patients examined with Glasgow Coma Scale Motor Score (GCS-M) on day 4 (72–96 h) post-arrest and available 6-month outcome were included. Poor outcome was defined as Cerebral Performance Category 3–5. Variations of the ERC/ESICM algorithm were explored within the same cohort. Results The ERC/ESICM algorithm identified poor outcome patients with 38.7% sensitivity (95% CI 33.1–44.7) and 100% specificity (95% CI 98.8–100) in a cohort of 585 patients. An alternative cut-off for serum neuron-specific enolase, an alternative EEG-classification and variations of the GCS-M had minor effects on the sensitivity without causing false positive predictions. The highest overall sensitivity, 42.5% (95% CI 36.7–48.5), was achieved when prognosticating patients irrespective of GCS-M score, with 100% specificity (95% CI 98.8–100) remaining. Conclusion The ERC/ESICM algorithm and all exploratory multimodal variations thereof investigated in this study predicted poor outcome without false positive predictions and with sensitivities 34.6–42.5%. Our results should be validated prospectively, preferably in patients where withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy is uncommon to exclude any confounding from self-fulfilling prophecies.Keywords
Funding Information
- Vetenskapsrådet (20133572)
- Skånes universitetssjukhus
- Region Skåne
- Hjärt-Lungfonden (20090275, 20120491)
- AFA Försäkring (100001)
- Gyllenstierna-Krapperup Foundation
- Swedish National Health System (M2010/1837, M2010/1641, 353301)
- Swedish Society of Medicine
- Koch Foundation
- TrygFonden
- European Clinical Research Infrastructures Network
- Thelma Zoega Foundation
- Stig and Ragna Gorthon Foundation
- Thure Carlsson Foundation
- Hans-Gabriel and Alice Trolle-Wachtmeister Foundation
- Lions Researchfund Skåne
- Södra Sjukvårdsregionen Regionalt Forskningsstöd
- The Swedish Brain Foundation
- Torsten Söderberg Foundation at the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences
- Lundbeckfonden
This publication has 43 references indexed in Scilit:
- The impact of oxygen and carbon dioxide management on outcome after cardiac arrestCurrent Opinion in Critical Care, 2014
- Targeted Temperature Management at 33°C versus 36°C after Cardiac ArrestNew England Journal of Medicine, 2013
- Predictors of poor neurological outcome in adult comatose survivors of cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Part 2: Patients treated with therapeutic hypothermiaResuscitation, 2013
- Predictors of poor neurological outcome in adult comatose survivors of cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Part 1: Patients not treated with therapeutic hypothermiaResuscitation, 2013
- American Clinical Neurophysiology Society’s Standardized Critical Care EEG TerminologyJournal Of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2013
- Target temperature management after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest—a randomized, parallel-group, assessor-blinded clinical trial—rationale and designAmerican Heart Journal, 2012
- Prognostication after cardiac arrest and hypothermia: A prospective studyAnnals of Neurology, 2010
- Practice Parameter: Prediction of outcome in comatose survivors after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (an evidence-based review)Neurology, 2006
- Prediction of poor outcome within the first 3 days of postanoxic comaNeurology, 2006
- ASSESSMENT OF OUTCOME AFTER SEVERE BRAIN DAMAGE A Practical ScaleThe Lancet, 1975