Using and Reporting the Delphi Method for Selecting Healthcare Quality Indicators: A Systematic Review
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 9 June 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 6 (6), e20476
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020476
Abstract
Delphi technique is a structured process commonly used to developed healthcare quality indicators, but there is a little recommendation for researchers who wish to use it. This study aimed 1) to describe reporting of the Delphi method to develop quality indicators, 2) to discuss specific methodological skills for quality indicators selection 3) to give guidance about this practice. Three electronic data bases were searched over a 30 years period (1978–2009). All articles that used the Delphi method to select quality indicators were identified. A standardized data extraction form was developed. Four domains (questionnaire preparation, expert panel, progress of the survey and Delphi results) were assessed. Of 80 included studies, quality of reporting varied significantly between items (9% for year's number of experience of the experts to 98% for the type of Delphi used). Reporting of methodological aspects needed to evaluate the reliability of the survey was insufficient: only 39% (31/80) of studies reported response rates for all rounds, 60% (48/80) that feedback was given between rounds, 77% (62/80) the method used to achieve consensus and 57% (48/80) listed quality indicators selected at the end of the survey. A modified Delphi procedure was used in 49/78 (63%) with a physical meeting of the panel members, usually between Delphi rounds. Median number of panel members was 17(Q1:11; Q3:31). In 40/70 (57%) studies, the panel included multiple stakeholders, who were healthcare professionals in 95% (38/40) of cases. Among 75 studies describing criteria to select quality indicators, 28 (37%) used validity and 17(23%) feasibility. The use and reporting of the Delphi method for quality indicators selection need to be improved. We provide some guidance to the investigators to improve the using and reporting of the method in future surveys.Keywords
This publication has 47 references indexed in Scilit:
- Using the Delphi Technique to Determine Which Outcomes to Measure in Clinical Trials: Recommendations for the Future Based on a Systematic Review of Existing StudiesPLoS Medicine, 2010
- TENTS guidelines: development of post-disaster psychosocial care guidelines through a Delphi processThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 2010
- Mental Health First Aid guidelines for helping a suicidal person: a Delphi consensus study in IndiaInternational Journal of Mental Health Systems, 2010
- Identifying outcome-based indicators and developing a curriculum for a continuing medical education programme on rational prescribing using a modified Delphi processBMC Medical Education, 2008
- Development of ovarian cancer surgery quality indicators using a modified Delphi approachGynecologic Oncology, 2005
- Quality indicators for primary care mental health servicesQuality and Safety in Health Care, 2003
- Quality improvement research: understanding the science of change in health careQuality and Safety in Health Care, 2002
- Expert consensus on the desirable characteristics of review criteria for improvement of health care qualityQuality and Safety in Health Care, 2001
- Consensus methods in prescribing researchJournal of Clinical Pharmacy & Therapeutics, 2001
- What (Little) We Know about Formal Group Discussion ProceduresSmall Group Research, 1993