Mitigation of indirect environmental effects of GM crops
- 17 April 2007
- journal article
- Published by The Royal Society in Proceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences
- Vol. 274 (1617), 1475-1479
- https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2007.0401
Abstract
Currently, the UK has no procedure for the approval of novel agricultural practices that is based on environmental risk management principles. Here, we make a first application of the 'bow-tie' risk management approach in agriculture, for assessment of land use changes, in a case study of the introduction of genetically modified herbicide tolerant (GMHT) sugar beet. There are agronomic and economic benefits, but indirect environmental harm from increased weed control is a hazard. The Farm Scale Evaluation (FSE) trials demonstrated reduced broad-leaved weed biomass and seed production at the field scale. The simplest mitigation measure is to leave a proportion of rows unsprayed in each GMHT crop field. Our calculations, based on FSE data, show that a maximum of 2% of field area left unsprayed is required to mitigate weed seed production and 4% to mitigate weed biomass production. Tilled margin effects could simply be mitigated by increasing the margin width from 0.5 to 1.5 m. Such changes are cheap and simple to implement in farming practices. This case study demonstrates the usefulness of the bow-tie risk management approach and the transparency with which hazards can be addressed. If adopted generally, it would help to enable agriculture to adopt new practices with due environmental precaution.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- How does scientific risk assessment of GM crops fit within the wider risk analysis?Trends in Plant Science, 2007
- Farming and the Fate of Wild NatureScience, 2005
- Responses of plants and invertebrate trophic groups to contrasting herbicide regimes in the Farm Scale Evaluations of genetically modified herbicide–tolerant cropsPhilosophical Transactions Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2003
- Weeds in fields with contrasting conventional and genetically modified herbicide–tolerant crops. II. Effects on individual speciesPhilosophical Transactions Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2003
- Weeds in fields with contrasting conventional and genetically modified herbicide–tolerant crops. I. Effects on abundance and diversityPhilosophical Transactions Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2003
- A novel approach to the use of genetically modified herbicide tolerant crops for environmental benefitProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2003
- An introduction to the Farm‐Scale Evaluations of genetically modified herbicide‐tolerant cropsJournal of Applied Ecology, 2003
- Economic consequences for UK farmers of growing GM herbicide tolerant sugar beetAnnals of Applied Biology, 2003
- Risk assessment in clinical pharmacyInternational Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, 2003
- Agricultural intensification and the collapse of Europe's farmland bird populationsProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2001