A COMPARISON OF SIX POTENTIAL EVAPOTRANSPIRATION METHODS FOR REGIONAL USE IN THE SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES
- 8 June 2005
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Jawra Journal of the American Water Resources Association
- Vol. 41 (3), 621-633
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2005.tb03759.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- SPATIAL VARIABILITY IN WATER‐BALANCE MODEL PERFORMANCE IN THE CONTERMINOUS UNITED STATES1Jawra Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 2002
- A comparison of the watershed hydrology of coastal forested wetlands and the mountainous uplands in the Southern USJournal of Hydrology, 2002
- A REVISED VERSION OF PnET‐II TO SIMULATE THE HYDROLOGIC CYCLE IN SOUTHEASTERN FORESTED AREAS1Jawra Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 2002
- Comparison of methods for applying the Priestley–Taylor equation at a regional scaleHydrological Processes, 2001
- EFFECTS OF BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON FOREST STREAMWATER QUALITY IN EASTERN KENTUCKY1Jawra Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1998
- Potential evaporation functions compared on US watersheds: Possible implications for global-scale water balance and terrestrial ecosystem modelingJournal of Hydrology, 1998
- Regional models of potential evaporation and reference evapotranspiration for the northeast USAJournal of Hydrology, 1996
- Maps of regional evapotranspiration and runoff/precipitation ratios in the northeast United StatesJournal of Hydrology, 1995
- On the Assessment of Surface Heat Flux and Evaporation Using Large-Scale ParametersMonthly Weather Review, 1972
- An Approach toward a Rational Classification of ClimateGeographical Review, 1948