Breast conservation therapy rates are no different in medically indigent versus insured patients with early stage breast cancer
- 16 September 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Surgical Oncology
- Vol. 84 (2), 57-62
- https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.10291
Abstract
Purpose Multiple prospective, randomized studies show that breast conservation therapy (BCT) results in survival rates equal to mastectomy (Mx) for patients with early stage breast cancer (ESBC). Nevertheless, BCT remains underused in certain areas of the nation, without clearly definable reasons. Several studies have implicated socioeconomic status as one potential cause for this disparity in BCT usage. We sought to compare BCT rates in the medically indigent versus insured patients, within the same institution. Methods Data from 1993 to 2000, collected from the institutional tumor registry and the hospital's claims records, were analyzed for 928 patients with ESBC (Stages 0, I, and II), treated at a single medical center. The same surgeons treated both insured and indigent patients. Patients treated by BCT or Mx were compared for age, race, stage, insurance status, access to a radiation therapy center, surgeon, and year of diagnosis. Results Patient age, race, surgeon, or insurance status did not significantly affect the rate of mastectomy. Stage I patients (P < 0.001) and those treated after 1995 had higher BCT rates (54.9% in 1993–95 vs. 70.7% in 1996–2000; P < 0.001). Travel distance to a radiation therapy center had no significant impact on BCT rates, except for patients >40 miles distant. Conclusions These data refute the hypothesis that socioeconomic status, as reflected by medical insurance, is a determinant of BCT in women with ESBC. Distance of <40 miles to a radiation therapy facility, Stage I disease, and diagnosis after 1995 were factors associated with higher BCT rates. J. Surg. Oncol. 2003;84:57–62.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Factors Predicting the Use of Breast-Conserving Therapy in Stage I and II Breast CarcinomaJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2001
- Low‐income women with early‐stage breast cancer: physician and patient decision‐making stylesPsycho‐Oncology, 2001
- Low use of breast conservation surgery in medically indigent populationsThe American Journal of Surgery, 1999
- Breast conservation therapy in the United States following the 1990 National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference on the treatment of patients with early stage invasive breast carcinomaCancer, 1999
- Standards for diagnosis and management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast. American College of Radiology. American College of Surgeons. College of American Pathologists. Society of Surgical Oncology.CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 1998
- Lumpectomy and radiation therapy for the treatment of intraductal breast cancer: findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-17.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1998
- Change in the Use of Breast-Conserving Surgery in Western Washington After the 1990 NIH Consensus Development ConferenceArchives of Surgery, 1997
- Reanalysis and Results after 12 Years of Follow-up in a Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Total Mastectomy with Lumpectomy with or without Irradiation in the Treatment of Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1995
- Breast conservation is a safe method in patients with small cancer of the breast. Long-term results of three randomised trials on 1,973 patientsEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 1995
- Treatment of Early-Stage Breast CancerJAMA, 1991