Computational Study of the Factors Controlling Enantioselectivity in Ruthenium(II) Hydrogenation Catalysts

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
The reduction of prochiral ketones catalyzed by Ru(diphosphine)(diamine) complexes has been studied at the DFT-PBE level of theory. Calculations have been conducted on real size systems [trans-Ru(H)2(S,S-dpen)(S-xylbinap) + acetophenone], [trans-Ru(H)2(S,S-dpen)(S-tolbinap) + acetophenone] and [trans-Ru(H)2(S,S-dpen)(S-xylbinap) + cyclohexyl methyl ketone] with the aim of identifying the factors controlling the enantioselectivity in Ru(diphosphine)(diamine) catalysts. The high enantiomeric excess (99%) in the hydrogenation of acetophenone catalyzed by trans-Ru(H)2(S,S-dpen)(S-xylbinap) has been explained in terms of the existence of a stable intermediate along the reaction pathway associated with the (R)-alcohol. The formation of this intermediate is hindered with the competitive pathways, which consequently increases the activation energy for the hydrogen transfer acetophenone/(S)-phenylethanol reaction. For the [trans-Ru(H)2(S,S-dpen)(S-tolbinap) + acetophenone] system, the lower enantioselectivity (i.e. 80%) is rationalized by the smaller differences in the activation energy between the competitive pathways which differentiate between the two diastereomeric approaches of the prochiral ketone. The DFT-PBE results suggest that this reaction is driven to the (R)-product only by the process of binding the acetophenone to the active site of the trans-Ru(H)2(S,S-dpen)(S-tolbinap) catalyst. For the hydrogenation of cyclohexyl methyl ketone catalyzed by trans-Ru(H)2(S,S-dpen)(S-xylbinap), the low performance in the enantioselective hydrogenation of the dialkyl ketone (i.e. 37%) is again explained by the small differences in the activation and binding energies which are the factors which could effectively differentiate between the two alkyl groups.

This publication has 48 references indexed in Scilit: