Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for external rectal prolapse is safe and effective in the elderly. Does this make perineal procedures obsolete?
- 24 March 2011
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Colorectal Disease
- Vol. 13 (5), 561-566
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02242.x
Abstract
Perineal approaches are considered to be the 'gold standard' in treating elderly patients with external rectal prolapse (ERP) because morbidity and mortality with perineal approaches are lower compared with transabdominal approaches. Higher recurrence rates and poorer function are tolerated as a compromise. The aim of the present study was to assess the safety of laparoscopic ventral rectopexy (LVR) in elderly patients, compared with perineal approaches. The prospectively collected databases from two tertiary referral pelvic floor units were interrogated to identify outcome in patients of 80 years of age and older with full-thickness ERP treated by LVR. The primary end-points were age, American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) grade, mortality, and major and minor morbidity. Secondary end-points were length of stay (LOS) and recurrence. Between January 2002 and December 2008, 80 [median age 84 (80-97) years] patients underwent rectopexy. The mean ± standard deviation ASA grade was 2.44 (± 0.57) (two patients were ASA grade I, 42 patients were ASA grade II, 35 patients were ASA grade III and one patient was ASA grade IV). The median LOS was 3 (range 1-37) days. There was no mortality, and 10 (13%) patients had complications (one major and nine minor). At a median follow-up of 23 (2-82) months, two (3%) patients had developed a recurrent full-thickness prolapse. LVR is a safe procedure for using to treat full-thickness ERP in elderly patients. Mortality, morbidity and hospital stay are comparable with published rates for perineal procedures, with a 10-fold lower recurrence.Keywords
This publication has 46 references indexed in Scilit:
- Surgical Management of Rectal ProlapseArchives of Surgery, 2005
- Functional results two years after laparoscopic rectopexyThe American Journal of Surgery, 2001
- Consensus statement of definitions for anorectal physiology and rectal cancerDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 2001
- Laparoscopic repair of rectal prolapseSurgical Endoscopy, 2000
- Laparoscopic suture rectopexy without resection is effective treatment for full-thickness rectal prolapseDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 2000
- Successful treatment of rectal prolapse by laparoscopic suture rectopexySurgical Endoscopy, 1999
- Laparoscopic surgery for rectal prolapse and outlet obstructionDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1999
- Laparoscopic rectopexy according to Wells.Surgical Endoscopy, 1999
- Stapled laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapseSurgical Endoscopy, 1995
- Treatment of complete rectal prolapse: To narrow, to wrap, to suspend, to fix, to encircle, to plicate or to resect?World Journal of Surgery, 1992