Optimization of the treatment with immunosuppressants and biologics in inflammatory bowel disease
Open Access
- 1 January 2014
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. in World Journal of Gastroenterology
- Vol. 20 (29), 9675-90
- https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i29.9675
Abstract
Many placebo controlled trials and meta-analyses evaluated the efficacy of different drugs for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including immunosuppressants and biologics. Their use is indicated in moderate to severe disease in non responders to corticosteroids and in steroid-dependent patients, as induction and maintainance treatment. Infliximab, as well as cyclosporine, is considered a second line therapy in the case of severe ulcerative colitis, or non-responders to intravenous corticosteroids. An adequate dosage and duration of therapy with thiopurines should be reached before evaluating their efficacy. Methotrexate is a valid option in patients with Crohn's disease but its use is confined to patients who are intolerant or non-responders to thiopurines. Evidence for the use of methotrexate in ulcerative colitis is insufficient. The use of thalidomide and mycophenolate mofetil is not recommended in patients with inflammatory bowel disease, these treatments could be considered in case of failure of all other therapeutic options. In patients with moderately active ulcerative colitis, refractory to thiopurines, the use of tacrolimus is considered an alternative to biologics. An increase of the dose or a decrease in the interval of administration of biological treatment could be useful in the presence of an incomplete clinical response. In the case of primary failure of an anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha a switch to another one should be considered. Data on the efficacy of combination therapy are up to now insufficient to consider this strategy in all IBD patients. The final outcome of the treatment should be considered the clinical remission, with mucosa healing, and not the clinical response. The evaluation of serum concentration of thiopurine methyl transferase activity, thiopurine metabolites, biologic serum levels and antibiologic antibodies could be useful for the management of the treatment but it has not been routinely applied in clinical practice. The evidence of high risk development of lymphoma and cutaneous malignancies should be considered in patients treated with immunosuppressants and biologics for a long period.Keywords
This publication has 123 references indexed in Scilit:
- Topical Tacrolimus Therapy for Antibiotic-Refractory PouchitisDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 2013
- Adalimumab Induces and Maintains Clinical Remission in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Ulcerative ColitisGastroenterology, 2012
- Use of thiopurine testing in the management of inflammatory bowel diseases in clinical practice: A worldwide survey of expertsInflammatory Bowel Diseases, 2011
- Systematic review: the role of tacrolimus in the management of Crohn’s diseaseAlimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 2011
- Relapse Rate Following Azathioprine Withdrawal in Maintaining Remission for Crohn’s Disease: A Meta-AnalysisDigestive Diseases and Sciences, 2011
- Infliximab, Azathioprine, or Combination Therapy for Crohn's DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 2010
- Increased Risk for Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel DiseaseClinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 2009
- Risk of Lymphoma Associated With Combination Anti–Tumor Necrosis Factor and Immunomodulator Therapy for the Treatment of Crohn's Disease: A Meta-AnalysisClinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 2009
- The effect of tacrolimus (FK-506) on Japanese patients with refractory Crohn’s diseaseThe Esophagus, 2008
- Mycophenolic acid for psoriasisJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 1987