A meta-analysis comparing conservative treatment versus acute appendectomy for complicated appendicitis (abscess or phlegmon)
Top Cited Papers
- 1 June 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Surgery
- Vol. 147 (6), 818-829
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2009.11.013
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- Routine interval appendectomy is unnecessary after conservative treatment of appendiceal massColorectal Disease, 2007
- Matched analysis of nonoperative management vs immediate appendectomy for perforated appendicitisJournal of Pediatric Surgery, 2007
- Interval Appendectomy: An Old New OperationJournal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques, 2006
- The optimal management of adult patients presenting with appendiceal abscess: “Conservative” vs immediate operative managementCurrent Surgery, 2004
- Predictors of Outcome for Children with Perforated Appendicitis Initially Treated with Non-Operative ManagementSurgical Infections, 2004
- Conservative management of appendix mass in childrenBritish Journal of Surgery, 2001
- The Management of Appendiceal Mass in Children: Is Interval Appendectomy Necessary?Surgery Today, 2001
- Interval Appendectomy for Perforated Appendicitis in ChildrenJournal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques, 1998
- Meta-analysis in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1986
- Beta blockade during and after myocardial infarction: An overview of the randomized trialsProgress in Cardiovascular Diseases, 1985