Screening, evaluation, and management of cancer‐related fatigue: Ready for implementation to practice?
Open Access
- 11 March 2015
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians
- Vol. 65 (3), 190-211
- https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21268
Abstract
Answer questions and earn CME/CNE Evidence regarding cancer‐related fatigue (fatigue) has accumulated sufficiently such that recommendations for screening, evaluation, and/or management have been released recently by 4 leading cancer organizations. These evidence‐based fatigue recommendations are available for clinicians, and some have patient versions; but barriers at the patient, clinician, and system levels hinder dissemination and implementation into practice. The underlying biologic mechanisms for this debilitating symptom have not been elucidated completely, hindering the development of mechanistically driven interventions. However, significant progress has been made toward methods for screening and comprehensively evaluating fatigue and other common symptoms using reliable and valid self‐report measures. Limited data exist to support the use of any pharmacologic agent; however, several nonpharmacologic interventions have been shown to be effective in reducing fatigue in adults. Never before have evidence‐based recommendations for fatigue management been disseminated by 4 premier cancer organizations (the National Comprehensive Cancer, the Oncology Nursing Society, the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer/Canadian Association of Psychosocial Oncology, and the American Society of Clinical Oncology). Clinicians may ask: Are we ready for implementation into practice? The reply: A variety of approaches to screening, evaluation, and management are ready for implementation. To reduce fatigue severity and distress and its impact on functioning, intensified collaborations and close partnerships between clinicians and researchers are needed, with an emphasis on system‐wide efforts to disseminate and implement these evidence‐based recommendations. CA Cancer J Clin 2015;65: 190–211. © 2015 American Cancer Society.Keywords
This publication has 104 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reply to MolassiotisSupportive Care in Cancer, 2013
- Examining the role of physical activity in reducing postcancer fatigueSupportive Care in Cancer, 2011
- Light treatment prevents fatigue in women undergoing chemotherapy for breast cancerSupportive Care in Cancer, 2011
- Effects of a 1-Week Inpatient Course Including Information, Physical Activity, and Group Sessions for Prostate Cancer PatientsJournal of Cancer Education, 2011
- Psychosocial interventions to improve quality of life in prostate cancer survivors and their intimate or family partnersQuality of Life Research, 2010
- I’m so tired: biological and genetic mechanisms of cancer-related fatigueQuality of Life Research, 2010
- Meaning‐centered group psychotherapy for patients with advanced cancer: a pilot randomized controlled trialPsycho‐Oncology, 2009
- Biofield Therapies: Helpful or Full of Hype? A Best Evidence SynthesisInternational Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 2009
- Depression screening using the Patient Health Questionnaire‐9 administered on a touch screen computerPsycho‐Oncology, 2008
- A Brief Measure for Assessing Generalized Anxiety DisorderArchives of Internal Medicine, 2006