Reducing Status Effects with Computer-Mediated Communication: Evidence from Two Distinct National Cultures
- 1 June 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Informa UK Limited in Journal of Management Information Systems
- Vol. 15 (1), 119-141
- https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1998.11518199
Abstract
Matching laboratory experiments were conducted in two distinct national cultures to investigate whether computer-mediated communication (CMC) can reduce status effects during group communication in both national cultures. Three independent variables were studied: national culture (Singapore versus U.S.), task type (intellective versus preference), and communication medium (unsupported versus CMC). Three different facets of status effects were measured as dependent variables: status influence, sustained influence, and perceived influence. Singapore groups reported higher sustained influence than U.S. groups. Preference task groups experienced higher status influence and sustained influence than intellective task groups. Unsupported groups also had higher status influence and sustained influence compared to CMC groups. In addition, Singapore groups that completed the preference task in the unsupported setting reported higher perceived influence than groups under other treatments. These results demonstrate that CMC appears to be able to reduce status effects during group communication, both in Singapore and in the United States. This is especially true when groups are working on a preference task. Moreover, status influence appears to be more sustainable in Singapore groups, where group members appear to be more conscious of its presence, than in U.S. groups.Keywords
This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- Group discussion and first advocacy effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision making groupsOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1992
- Electronic meeting systemsCommunications of the ACM, 1991
- Information Technology to Support Electronic MeetingsMIS Quarterly, 1988
- The influence of member status differences and task type on group consensus and member position change.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986
- Becoming first among equals: Moral considerations in jury foreman selection.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1985
- Clustering Countries on Attitudinal Dimensions: A Review and SynthesisAcademy of Management Review, 1985
- Group SizeAmerican Behavioral Scientist, 1981
- Participative Management: A Reexamination of the ClassicsAcademy of Management Review, 1978
- Analysis of Variance in Small Group ResearchPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1978
- INTERVENTIONS INTO GROUP PROCESS: AN APPROACH TO IMPROVING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF GROUPS*Decision Sciences, 1974