Focus groups and methodological rigour outside the minority world: making the method work to its strengths in Tanzania
- 5 April 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Qualitative Research
- Vol. 12 (2), 111-130
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794111416145
Abstract
This article examines some methodological issues that arise when conducting focus group discussions in the majority world (developing countries), and describes one way of addressing them. While the method is widely used in the majority world, the methodological literature on how to moderate focus groups builds on accumulated experiences of how conversations work in the minority world (developed countries). This article suggests a way to apply the method more rigorously in a majority-world context. It draws on a trial-and-error innovation process spanning 40 discussions in Tanzania. Ensuring quality in data generation required thorough attention to issues of alterity, positionality and power. These issues are common challenges to methodological rigour when researching across difference in the majority world. But this article contends that if used correctly and to its strengths, the focus group method can indeed address and solve these challenges. This also entails creating appropriate conditions for interaction among focus groups participants.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Articulating Contextualized Knowledge: Focus Groups and/as Public Participation?Science as Culture, 2008
- Focus groups and the study of violenceQualitative Research, 2008
- Reconciling Multiple Researcher Positionalities and Languages in International ResearchResearch in Comparative and International Education, 2006
- Focus group method and methodology: current practice and recent debateInternational Journal of Research & Method in Education, 2006
- Analysing Interaction in Focus GroupsPublished by SAGE Publications ,2006
- `Where are you Really from?': Representation, Identity and Power in the Fieldwork Experiences of a South Asian DiasporicQualitative Research, 2003
- Focus Groups in Rural Gujarat, India: A Modified ApproachQualitative Health Research, 2002
- Willingness to pay for district hospital services in rural TanzaniaHealth Policy and Planning, 1996
- A Discussion of “Women in the Field”: The Politics of Feminist FieldworkThe Professional Geographer, 1994
- Getting Personal: Reflexivity, Positionality, and Feminist Research∗The Professional Geographer, 1994