Performance of metakaolin and Portland cements in ettringite formation as determined by ASTM C 452-68: kinetic and morphological differences
- 31 July 2005
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Cement and Concrete Research
- Vol. 35 (7), 1269-1284
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.10.002
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- Kinetochemical and morphological differentiation of ettringites by the Le Chatelier–Anstett testCement and Concrete Research, 2002
- Sulfate attack research — whither now?Cement and Concrete Research, 2001
- Diffusion of sulfate ions into cement stone regarding simultaneous chemical reactions and resulting effectsCement and Concrete Research, 1999
- Comparative XRD analysis ettringite originating from pozzolan and from portland cementCement and Concrete Research, 1996
- The stability of ettringiteAdvances in Cement Research, 1993
- Aluminum‐27 and Silicon‐29 Magic‐Angle Spinning Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Study of the Kaolinite‐Mullite TransformationJournal of the American Ceramic Society, 1988
- A reply to a discussion by B. Mather of the paper “theories of expansion in sulfoaluminate-type expansive cements: Schools of thought”Cement and Concrete Research, 1984
- A discussion of the paper “theories of expansion in sulfoaluminate-type expansive cements: Schools of thought,” by M.D. CohenCement and Concrete Research, 1984
- Modeling of expansive cementsCement and Concrete Research, 1983
- Mechanism of sulfate attack on portland cement concrete — Another lookCement and Concrete Research, 1983